Requests for map modifications (UR-topic) [ARCHIEF]

Re: Requests for map modifications (UR-topic)

Postby darkneon » Sat Apr 14, 2012 2:21 pm

https://world.waze.com/editor/?zoom=7&l ... TTTFTTTTFT

na weken hier liggen te worstelen met permissions etc om uiteindelijk alles hier te maken zoals het is vanaf eind vorig jaar heeft Tux2000 hier nu zowat alles doodleuk weer veranderd zoals het NIET is ! Bedankt daarvoor!
De Aerials zijn zowat overal outdated maargoed...
Waze @ Samsung Galaxy Note Android 4.0.4
darkneon
 
Posts: 142
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 6:35 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: Requests for map modifications (UR-topic)

Postby maantje76 » Sat Apr 14, 2012 2:45 pm

darkneon wrote:https://world.waze.com/editor/?zoom=7&lat=50.94588&lon=5.4946&layers=BFTFTTTFTTFTTTTFTTTTFT

na weken hier liggen te worstelen met permissions etc om uiteindelijk alles hier te maken zoals het is vanaf eind vorig jaar heeft Tux2000 hier nu zowat alles doodleuk weer veranderd zoals het NIET is ! Bedankt daarvoor!
De Aerials zijn zowat overal outdated maargoed...


Correct. It's not funny if someone is messing up your work. I would like to help you make it correct again, but I also don't know the situation. According the GPS points it's look pretty much ok for me. But there's not driven on all segments by a wazer. I already made some changes as Turn restrictions. p[lease let me know if I can do something to help you...
Image
maantje76
Waze Champs
 
Posts: 3717
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 11:16 pm
Location: BeNeLux
Has thanked: 42 times
Been thanked: 130 times

Re: Requests for map modifications (UR-topic)

Postby darkneon » Sat Apr 14, 2012 6:52 pm

Here is how it should be

Image
Waze @ Samsung Galaxy Note Android 4.0.4
darkneon
 
Posts: 142
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 6:35 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: Requests for map modifications (UR-topic)

Postby maantje76 » Sat Apr 14, 2012 11:28 pm

darkneon wrote:Here is how it should be


Something like this?
Image
maantje76
Waze Champs
 
Posts: 3717
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 11:16 pm
Location: BeNeLux
Has thanked: 42 times
Been thanked: 130 times

Re: Requests for map modifications (UR-topic)

Postby darkneon » Sun Apr 15, 2012 6:32 am

maantje76 wrote:
darkneon wrote:Here is how it should be


Something like this?

Yes thank you
Waze @ Samsung Galaxy Note Android 4.0.4
darkneon
 
Posts: 142
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 6:35 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: Requests for map modifications (UR-topic)

Postby fvwazing » Mon Apr 16, 2012 11:32 am

If, like here, I don't know the exact situation I take the GPS-tracks in account. And they show that roundabout is really really big now - maybe twice the size.

Oh - and shit happens. If an editor is working off aerials, other maps... he may get 80%-90% right most of the time. If the area was unedited, 80%-90% is a really good score. If the area was edited before, take care! If the edited situation is different from what other sources tell you, leave it as is, or drive there first, or ask around. If all that brings nothing it may be that the "higher goal" of countrywide connectivity is more important than the integrity of a single roundabout. In the process of connecting ALL the freeways, majors and minors in Belgium many such details may get lost or set wrong. In your case it meant that the last hundreds of meters to your work went wrong; but Tux2000's work may have connected hundreds of other Wazers, some km further away. It is an iterative process, after all. And as the long-distance roads in your area are all cleared up now there is less chance of someone starting to edit.
Waze jezelf!
600K+ edits
AM for some 25.000 km² around Maastricht, the Netherlands
iPhone 3Gs / iOS 6.0.1
fvwazing
Waze Champs
 
Posts: 2874
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 2:48 pm
Has thanked: 101 times
Been thanked: 67 times

Re: Requests for map modifications (UR-topic)

Postby stijnley » Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:16 pm

Dag brave mensen!

Kan er iemand van jullie enkele straten unlocken (Coupure-rechts, Twaalfkameren, Johan Daisnestraat, Brioolstraat) zodat ik mijn aanpassing volledig correct kan doorvoeren (sommige pijlen moeten groen worden!)

hier de link: https://world.waze.com/editor/?zoom=6&l ... 6,88484702

bedankt!
Image
|| Area Manager Gent | Belgium ||
stijnley
 
Posts: 44
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 2:19 pm
Location: Belgium - Gent
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Requests for map modifications (UR-topic)

Postby ignazw » Mon Apr 23, 2012 7:06 pm

OK, on the map it is indeed fixed. But on the road there is still no navigation from the E40 onto the E314. So I guess we still have to wait. I wonder how many Wazers take Waze's advice to exit at Bertem...

maantje76 wrote:
ignazw wrote:De laatste week weigert Waze routering van de E40 komende uit Brussel de E413 op te doen. Hier is het probleem, een afslag die niet toegestaan wordt: https://world.waze.com/editor/?zoom=4&l ... =151053847
Toch wel essentiëel voor correcte routering om de connecties goed te hebben.


Just a small remember, please try to keep your request in English, so our French members can follow your post also (hopefully).

About your request, there's nothing wrong at this moment. Maybe someone already fixed it. Livemap indeed shows some problems over here.

Unfortunately it will take some time before it's correct in the app (approximately 1-3 weeks).
AlfaRomeo on the road
ignazw
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2011 5:12 pm
Location: Belgium
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Requests for map modifications (UR-topic)

Postby ignazw » Mon Apr 23, 2012 7:16 pm

Now here is a funny one:
https://world.waze.com/editor/?zoom=5&l ... =150906586

Last week I reported, while queueing in the Kortenberglaan "pacman in Kberglaan?"
I received a request to clarify.

Today I drove through the Kortenberglaan again, and I still see the pacman road there, while having the navigation on. With pacman I mean munching away at new roads. But I noticed that this pacman road goes through the Schuman square, and stops somewhere on the other end. Obviously I don't drive on the pacman road, because I don't see 'myself' munching there while driving.

Checking the map, I think what I see is the tunnel underneath. I shouldn't see that while on the road. I can understand why the tunnel road is munchable, because nobody drives there because the GPS doesn't report this from tunnels. The road in the permalink above is actually what I see.

I don't think we should see tunnels underneath while driving above ground. I see nothing wrong with the map either. The tunnel is on level -3 and the Kortenberglaan is level 0, which is correct. Is this an issue with Waze?

Strangely, I drive the Kortenberglaan about once a week, and I never noticed this until a few weeks ago. But it is really obvious, so I wonder why I never noted it before. Has something changed in Waze?

Anyway, somebody who understands this, please fix! :-)
And go check on the road to see what I mean. While navigating I use the editor's colour theme, so munchable roads look green in that theme, and they are very obvious.
AlfaRomeo on the road
ignazw
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2011 5:12 pm
Location: Belgium
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Requests for map modifications (UR-topic)

Postby petervdveen » Mon Apr 23, 2012 8:39 pm

stijnley wrote:Dag brave mensen!

Kan er iemand van jullie enkele straten unlocken (Coupure-rechts, Twaalfkameren, Johan Daisnestraat, Brioolstraat) zodat ik mijn aanpassing volledig correct kan doorvoeren (sommige pijlen moeten groen worden!)

hier de link: https://world.waze.com/editor/?zoom=6&l ... 6,88484702

bedankt!

Zo goed? ;)
Coördinator BeNeLux
- Nederland Belgium Lëtzebuerg
ImageImageImageImage

peter@wazenederland.nl peter@wazebelgium.be
petervdveen
Waze Champs
 
Posts: 4782
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 4:43 pm
Location: Netherlands
Has thanked: 19 times
Been thanked: 124 times

PreviousNext

Return to Requests for map modifications (UR-Forum)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users