subs5 wrote:I think it is more technically correct to say "House numbers will direct the user to the location of the HN's anchor point on the named road segment."

If the house number is already included in the segment, then it should be deleted to reduce potential issues when searching.

If the house number is already included in the segment, it is redundant and should be deleted to reduce potential issues when searching for the address or editing the RPP.

RussPA wrote:One simple rule I usually follow is that if the RPP isn't on the same segment as the HN, I remove the HN for the same, valid reasons you mentioned, otherwise the HN can remain. This was what I meant by "HN and RPP next to each other can remain, only HN with a different stop point from the RPP should be removed", and that easy rule agrees with your examples.

If the correct stop point for a house/business is on another road segment (differently named segment) away from its properly labeled segment in Waze, then a Waze house number for that address should not be used. Instead, add a residential point place (RPP) which contains only the address. Be sure to have the number, street name, city name, and entry/exit point in the RPP; additionally ensure the RPP's city name is listed in the primary or alternate name on a nearby segment.

Where RPPs have been added to different segments than where their corresponding house numbers are anchored, such house numbers should be deleted. This will reduce potential problems with searching for the address or editing the RPP. Where RPPs have been added to the same segment as their corresponding house number (e.g. people just taking pictures of their houses), those HNs can remain.

Mvan231 wrote: I didn't see any changes in the first paragraph, but I added in the second paragraph with some minor modifications.