N210 - Rue Jules Cockx, Auderghem

Hi Steven,

Following a discussion we had a few days ago, I KISSed the upper left part of this area (see screenshots before and after) : https://www.waze.com/editor/?lon=4.40572&lat=50.81737&zoom=5&layers=901&env=row

My understanding is that N210 - Rue Jules Cockx should be kept with 2 parallel lanes because they are to far away on the right bottom side (close to E411) and the the GPS traces are differentiated.

Could you confirm that this is the right interpretation ?

Thanks.


Before :
After :

maybe a little bit to much kiss , I would redraw an extra lane between the N206 - N210

maybe - maybe not – we could wait if waze generates an automatic map-problem report ?

Let’s do this.

thanks.

Looks good… I did add a walking trail for the bus lane, next to the N206… And also changed a part of the so called N210 to primary, since the minor highway only starts exiting the freeway…

Thank you.

WME Validator reports an error because the bus lane (Walking Tray, a non-drivable road) is connect to a drivable road.
Isn’t the rule like for pedestrians boardwalks ?

Laurent

actually, don’t know how it is for bus lanes… :slight_smile:

I’ll disconnect because it is what WME Validator says to do and because it is how the example in the Wiki is made.

Have a good day. :slight_smile: