# Nebraska wiki updates - Places

**URL:** https://www.waze.com/discuss/t/nebraska-wiki-updates-places/175964
**Category:** Nebraska
**Created:** [August 28, 2015, 6:55pm UTC](https://www.waze.com/discuss/t/nebraska-wiki-updates-places/175964 "2015-08-28T18:55:38Z")
**Posts on this page:** 3
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![herrchin](https://www.waze.com/discuss/user_avatar/www.waze.com/herrchin/32/6341_2.png) [@herrchin](https://www.waze.com/discuss/u/herrchin)
#### Post date: [August 28, 2015, 6:55pm UTC](https://www.waze.com/discuss/t/nebraska-wiki-updates-places/175964/1 "2015-08-28T18:55:38Z")

</div>

I have some proposed additions to the Places section of the NE wiki ([https://wiki.waze.com/wiki/Nebraska#Places](https://wiki.waze.com/wiki/Nebraska#Places)).

Proposal: [https://wiki.waze.com/wiki/User:Herrchin/Place\_editing\_tips](https://wiki.waze.com/wiki/User:Herrchin/Place_editing_tips)

Thumbs up / thumbs down / adjustments? If I can get a general idea of yea/nay on this (and on the Driveways proposal), I’ll get the edits in place (no pun 😃 ).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![TheChrisK](https://www.waze.com/discuss/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/FF5252/32.png) [@TheChrisK](https://www.waze.com/discuss/u/TheChrisK)
#### Post date: [August 29, 2015, 2:38pm UTC](https://www.waze.com/discuss/t/nebraska-wiki-updates-places/175964/2 "2015-08-29T14:38:54Z")

</div>

Sounds good to me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![herrchin](https://www.waze.com/discuss/user_avatar/www.waze.com/herrchin/32/6341_2.png) [@herrchin](https://www.waze.com/discuss/u/herrchin)
#### Post date: [September 21, 2015, 6:50pm UTC](https://www.waze.com/discuss/t/nebraska-wiki-updates-places/175964/3 "2015-09-21T18:50:21Z")

</div>

Does anyone have any strong objections to including this in the general NE mapping best practices?

Places are an area that new editors are strongly recommended to begin with, so we should give them as much guiding documentation as we can!

If there are no objections soon, I will go ahead and make the update so that new editors have guidance. (We can always amend, revise, or delete the guidance as opinions and standards change)
