# The "extra perspective": why just resolving UR/MS is not enough to deliver truly better maps?

**URL:** https://www.waze.com/discuss/t/o-olhar-a-mais-por-que-resolver-apenas-o-ur-ms-nao-e-suficiente-para-entregar-mapas-realmente-melhores/399941
**Category:** Brasil: Mapas E Edições De Mapas
**Created:** [February 22, 2026, 10:40pm UTC](https://www.waze.com/discuss/t/o-olhar-a-mais-por-que-resolver-apenas-o-ur-ms-nao-e-suficiente-para-entregar-mapas-realmente-melhores/399941 "2026-02-22T22:40:42Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 25

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![GabiruX](https://www.waze.com/discuss/user_avatar/www.waze.com/gabirux/32/108138_2.png) [@GabiruX](https://www.waze.com/discuss/u/GabiruX)
#### Post date: [May 15, 2026, 1:07pm UTC](https://www.waze.com/discuss/t/o-olhar-a-mais-por-que-resolver-apenas-o-ur-ms-nao-e-suficiente-para-entregar-mapas-realmente-melhores/399941/25 "2026-05-15T13:07:03Z")

</div>

Jefreson, sorry to call this out here, but I’m taking advantage of your example.

I saw that a place with errors was accepted, but since 2016 we have followed the guideline (see [Locais: um recomeço!](https://www.waze.com/discuss/t/locais-um-recomeco/71416)) of zero tolerance for PURs with inconsistencies. The best practice, when faced with any error, is to reject the request and perform the addition separately, preventing the user from being considered a potential “trusted” user in the future.

 ![image](https://web-assets.waze.com/discuss/prod/original/3X/a/3/a3e0c72b6107a44424cdba66058546572e08d01b.png)

According to the history, I noticed a few things that fall outside the Wazeopedia guidelines.

1. Name (see [Locais](https://www.waze.com/discuss/t/locais/375106))  
It should be the name on the sign, specifically:

- Primary name: “Arca”
- Alternative name: “Associação dos Requianos do Cariri”

1. Phone (see [Locais](https://www.waze.com/discuss/t/locais/375106))  
The area code (DDD) must be filled in as (0XX) and not (XX), as per the Wazeopedia guidance.

2. Address  
The registered street is R. Alameda Vaticano, but it should be Al. Vaticano.

Otherwise, it’s exactly as you did—always pay attention to the locality. Whenever I accept or review a PUR, I usually analyze the place for potential errors.

---

_[View the full topic](https://www.waze.com/discuss/t/o-olhar-a-mais-por-que-resolver-apenas-o-ur-ms-nao-e-suficiente-para-entregar-mapas-realmente-melhores/399941)._