Update released - 2018.12.03.02
Adding option for preventing the Photo Viewer display from re-flowing as items are deleted. With this enabled you will need to close and reopen the viewer or click the refresh button for the empty spaces to be cleared.
Prettying up the Photo Viewer settings panel a little
And just as you post an update, I have an improvement suggestion. 
On my first run through my local area, I deleted a lot of photos, but there are still hundreds left. If I come back to check again in a week or two, Iâll be searching through a lot of good photos to find a few bad ones.
Is it possible to implement some sort of date filter? So that I could show, say, all photos since 1st December.
Iâm also mulling the possibility that I might want to compare the new ones to the existing ones. So maybe the filter could put a different border colour around the âfilteredâ photos?
SOOOOOoooooooâŚ
When Sebiseba handed over the code he had an option to hide Places that have been reviewed and the remaining pictures were good. The problem was there wasnât a way to un-hide a Place if a new picture was added - I am going to be working on that soon, which I think will accomplish what you are asking.
My plan is to track the Place and the picture IDs and if all the pictures currently assigned to a Place are in the âokayâ list, then the Place wonât show. If any of the pictures on the Place are not in the saved âokayâ pictures list, then display the Place and all of the pictures.
Might have an option to hide/show all of the already "okay"ed picturesâŚnot sure, though, as it starts to get complicated at that point 
Justin,
I think the best way is to save the pictureâs ID in localstorage in addition to the placeâs ID.
If a place already checked donât match with localstorage, un-âokayâ this place.
Yes, that is a part of the plan. Still working on how much more I want to put into it.
Is it possible for the date the photo was added to be shown in the photo viewer?
I believe so, but I cannot display the username
Understood, thatâs fine. Thanks!
The addition of Photo Viewer is great, as others have said. It sure makes quick work of occasional scans on military bases, to blast away any photos that slipped in, or were missed the first time a place was approved.
Is anyone else seeing duplication of new places when creating via PIE? Iâve seen it a little bit across all types of places, point and area both, but seems especially prevalent when creating an RPP through PIE. Usually I end up successfully saving and then have two identical and complete RPPs stacked, but it isnât uncommon to have four stacked up. Takes a while to delete them (one at a time). Between the deletion time and double checking every time I make one, it has become faster to make RPPs from scratch again. Before I start troubleshooting, just checking if if might already be a known issueâŚ
Yes, has happened to me a few times. Made me think I was crazy.
For me, this duplication is pretty consistent. Not 100%, but easily in the 70-80% range. And for the first time, I just created a map comment area and ended up with four of those stacked up, too.
Still not sure this script is responsible for it, but seeking more info before I dig further.
I canât reproduce any RPP duplication issues.
PIE doesnât do anything with MCs. If duplicates are being created it is likely another script, which may also be causing the duplicate RPP creation.
Upon further observance, it appears to be in some way associated with the new save flow. Iâll start doing some experimentation, but wonât post updates here in this thread, as it seems clear this script is not involved. I just had to delete four extra MC areas when five duplicates were created in a single save. Fun. Thanks.
The save flow seems buggy. Lot of errors pop up.
I get the duplicate when creating APs, never had an issue with MCs.
Update released - 2018.12.15.01
Added white-listing support. Huzzah!
To whitelist a Place click the green checkmark in the top right corner of that Placeâs section.
An option is available in the settings to enable displaying white-listed Places. This is only necessary if you want all white-listed Places to displayâŚmore below.
The images on the Places that have been white-listed will have a white border (see first screenshot). If a picture is in a PUR it will show with a red border. Images that are approved/active for a Place but you have not white-listed will display with a green border.
A Place that has been white-listed will display if there is a PUR or if there is a picture that has been added that you have not white-listed.
This is the first phase of the white-listing. I donât have as much time to work on scripts as I once did so I wanted to get this released seeing as how it was only a couple hours work but it has taken a week from start to finish. Next I want to add in flagging the Place if the name changes from what has been white-listed in the case where the Place went out of business/was taken over by another business. Any other ideas would be welcome.
I like the picture browser, but have two comments:
The green check-mark for whitelisting a place doesnât change when clicked, so you canât tell whether the place is currently whitelisted.
There doesnât seem to be any way to undo whitelisting. I clicked one checkmark by mistake and now I canât reverse it.
1 - The pictures gain a white border when it is whitelisted. Iâll remove the checkmark as well.
2 - Why do you need to� If you clicked it on accident review the pictures and remove the bad ones
Hi
I have 2 requests for Photo Viewer:
Enable to open a POI in an other tab when clicking on arrow
(if I want to delete a place, I click on arrow but when I open Viewer again I get another new scan centered with my actual position I then loose all pictures I hadnât checked)
Scan only in editable area.
Ty
If you close and re-open you arenât losing all pictures; you are just getting a new scan from your current location. If you utilize the whitelist feature it will reduce the number of results that you obtain when re-opening and makes it immensely easier to work large areas.
I donât think I can report only in editable area, but only that are editable, which will prevent loading of Places that are above your rank. Iâll add it in, though, since itâs the best that I can do with what we have available.