Search found 1934 matches

Two reasons they were recommended for removal, was they were extra data that had to be carried on the database, and they were mostly wrong from the original base map import. Since we no longer have to worry about the former and we have good references for the latter now, I can support their retentio...

Great effort on your part

The definition we are proposing is what was nationally agreed to from the beginning of places . I don't know when it was changed to area for all. I suspect it was a transcription error when the wiki page was created.

I don't think Lehigh and Northampton need to be included at all.

Thanks Renee. PA consistently ranks in the bottom 5% in corruption measures along with such stalwarts as LA and MS. PennDOT and the Turnpike Commission continue to make purchasing decisions that look like cozy vendor back scratching instead of solid highway design science. Corruption is rampant in o...

I'll reiterate my points. From my Hangout posts with some edits. -Our state road system is different than all the other states around us. We don't have county and township roads. SR covers a much wider band of road qualities. -Our state is much larger than any around us but NY -Our FC system is draw...

You assume PennDOT does FC well. They don't.

We are following the note we believe PA system to be overinclusive that's why we deviated

I'm not worried about that as those areas should have mature maps.

We are not overriding PennDOT FC. Both types are valid on state routes depending on state priorities. What we are overriding is our own internal state guidance as the to when a SR should have higher or lower priority. It stems from an apparent reluctance to shield important routes inside the city li...