iainhouse wrote:I'm not sure if this counts as a Jolly Driver or a Jolly Editor?General error
Reported on: January 18, 2015Reporter February 19, 2015 wrote:Hi,
You recently reported a General Error while on the A4050. Unfortunately Waze hasn't information to identify the problem.
Any additional information you could offer would be appreciated.
Thanksiainhouse(6) April 05, 2015 wrote:I don't know who asked for more information on Feb 19th because the UR says "Reporter". That means you're also the person who reported the problem in the first place!
Are you going to answer yourself, or can I close this report now?
bz2012 wrote:elle-emme wrote:Problem:
very hazardous road with cars parked permanently on both sides causing very narrow dangerous road in both directions with no warming. not really wrong directions however
Maybe tell them 'This should not be reported as a map problem. Changes to the map require many days to take effect. Use the Hazard or Closure report feature. Hazard and Closure reports take effect immediatly. '
Looks to me like a good place to report some cars on the shoulder of the road.
bz2012 wrote:olestas wrote:I think he wanted the address of report... sometimes people dont remember.
The e-mail that WAZE sends shows the location and gives a link to the report in the map editor.
It also shows the date of the report.
If THAT doesn't 'jog' the memory of the reporter, what will?
qwaletee wrote:I actually did that twice in the last last week in my area. One was consistent with local usage, and was needed due to a confusion of streets joining on each side. The other was an "official" but unsigned bridge name. It was needed because otherwise, the bridge above and street below wold have shared a name, and likely got a few drivers lost
Otherwise, I agree, caling out bridges is overkill. Some drivers will complain if you don't, other drivers will complain if you do. Most will have no problem either way.
Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot]