The place to get information and ask questions about everything to do with properly and successfully editing the Waze Map.

Use this forum for all general editing questions, and the sub-forums for specific types of Waze Map Editor features.

Moderators: Unholy, bextein

Re: Landmarks?

Postby Jpere » Tue Oct 09, 2012 4:38 pm

Karrows wrote:
mapcat wrote:
gordonski wrote:Just asking out of curiosity: What harm do these landmarks do?

If they appear on the client, they should be correct. Which means AMs would need to maintain them.

Businesses open and close all the time. When do you change them, and when do you delete them?

If there are 100 restaurants in the city, and only 50 show on the map, shouldn't the owners of the other 50 complain that Waze is treating the others better, giving them free advertising, or otherwise being unfair? Even the ones whose stores are physically too small to show?

How many more reasons do you want?

If a company decides to advertise on Waze, I have no problem with their stores being shown on the map for as long as they're paying for the advertising. But anyone else, no.

I like having them on the map and find them useful myself, and I think usability is the most important thing to focus on for waze. If I'm going to walmart or whatever other oversized retail giant, waze sometimes only directs me to the road in front of the store. But the store could be 1/2 mile off the road with the enormousness of the parking lots. If it shows up on the map, I know for sure where it is and what side of the road. So I like to mark the giant retail places as a parking lot landmark. Then also it fixes all the problem reports of people who go into the store with waze still on their phone, and prevents parking lot drivers showing up as traffic jams. That's enough resons to do it for me.

If a business complains they are not a landmark in waze, they can log in themselves and fix it.

This is actually a pretty fair point. Waze has never routed me into a shopping center, even though Parking Lot Roads exist that lead to a specific store I may searched for.

I always thought Waze would search for POI from Bing and then route you to the road closest that POI provided by Bing. However, many times we are just routed up to the main avenue that is near the POI, and if it's something like a store, the driver will never know what side of the road it's on since Waze is not like Google that sometimes says "your destination will be on the left/right."

I'm not sure that putting landmarks for stores is the solution, but I do think there is a pretty large limitation in Waze right now as far as routing to POI is concerned.

I wish they would just adopt Google's maps sometimes.
Posts: 206
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 3:52 am
Has thanked: 42 times
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: Landmarks?

Postby TruckOttr » Thu Oct 11, 2012 12:33 am

I personally wish businesses (and all the other landmark types) were visible and that they could be filtered so I only see the ones I want. Ideally it would be something more akin to a merge of Yelp and Waze. I don't necessarily want to see the buildings like in Google Earth, but it would be nice to be able to see where things are relative to each other.
Hayward, CA, Reno/Sparks, NV, Elko/Spring Creek, NV and apparently the N. NV section of Portola Valley, CA. :-)
Posts: 314
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 6:54 pm
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 82 times

Re: Landmarks?

Postby gabmtl » Thu Oct 11, 2012 2:00 pm

If I look at the "official" position on landmarks ... ... a_landmark is see:
"Creating and Editing a landmark
Some landmark types have the property of suppressing traffic jams, and this may be an unintentional consequence of suppressing traffic jams on adjacent roads and highways. Therefore, best practice when creating or editing landmarks is that the landmarks should not be snapped to roads, or cover roads that are not part of the landmark."

Any new editor would see that as an invitation to create all landmarks as they are available from the interface drop down menu for landmark type. That list is extensive, and yes a Store/Stall would be a valid choice. As would shopping Centers, however small they may be.
We need better rules.

One question would arises: How accurate the landmark needs to be to the satellite images ?
Any new user would think that the landmark needs to be closer to reality instead of a big blob. We recognize some buildings by their shape so that does makes sense. Some landmarks include the parking lot so it becomes a bigger one, thus more visible on the client. How does that translate to reality ? If the landmark goes beyond the building limits that would mean it will cover some parking roads but that is against the rules (see above).

The client code may wish to use or not the landmarks information, but as the code gets better it could use the information to improve searches, or directions.
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2011 12:53 am
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: Landmarks?

Postby AndyPoms » Thu Oct 11, 2012 2:15 pm

mtlgab wrote:Any new editor would see that as an invitation to create all landmarks as they are available from the interface drop down menu for landmark type. That list is extensive, and yes a Store/Stall would be a valid choice. As would shopping Centers, however small they may be.
We need better rules.

Check out the discussion over here: viewtopic.php?f=276&t=26005 and weigh in with your thoughts...
Waze Champ & Forum Moderator
USA Country Manager
Senior Area Manager: State of Connecticut
Wiki: Editing | Best Practices | FAQ
Waze Global Champs
Waze Global Champs
Posts: 7144
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 1:34 pm
Location: Hartford, CT
Has thanked: 128 times
Been thanked: 1306 times

Re: Landmarks?

Postby TrafficGuy01 » Sat Oct 27, 2012 6:34 pm

Why do we have all the options for landmarks if we don't use them???
Area Manager
Area Manager
Posts: 238
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:45 am
Has thanked: 70 times
Been thanked: 10 times


Postby AlanOfTheBerg » Sat Oct 27, 2012 7:25 pm

DTF69 wrote:Why do we have all the options for landmarks if we don't use them???

I am sure Waze great plans for them, but other sources are much more mature and easily available from the app. Perhaps they have plans again for the future, but IMO, they should remove 90% of the types for new landmarks.
Wiki Resources: Map Editing Manual |
Oregon-based US Country Manager | iPhone6 - VZ - iOS 10.2 | Waze v4.17
Waze Global Champs
Waze Global Champs
Posts: 23564
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 8:48 pm
Location: US Country Manager - Oregon, USA
Has thanked: 1116 times
Been thanked: 4717 times

Re: Landmarks?

Postby kickahaota » Sat Oct 27, 2012 7:58 pm

You also have to remember that Waze is a global app; the Waze infrastructure has to handle the whole world, but circumstances vary in different parts of the world. In some parts of the world, there are lots of really mature POI databases, so it makes sense for Waze to rely on those databases. In other parts of the world, POI databases may be spotty or nonexistent, so it makes sense for Waze to track that info itself. So the data entry options have to allow for all sorts of POIs to be entered; but that doesn't mean it's a good idea to enter them everywhere.

(Of course, yes, it would be possible -- and probably a good idea -- for Waze to hide the undesired landmark types for a given country when creating a new landmark in that country, even though the underlying map might continue to support those types.)
Mark Phaedrus - iPhone 6 - Verizon - iOS 9 - AM: Kenmore, WA and surrounding trees
Posts: 85
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 9:25 pm
Location: Seattle, WA
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 11 times


Return to Waze Map Editor

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users