Should a new freeway be mapped before it opens?

The place to get information and ask questions about everything to do with properly and successfully editing the Waze Map.

Use this forum for all general editing questions, and the sub-forums for specific types of Waze Map Editor features.

Moderators: Unholy, bextein

Re: Should a new freeway be mapped before it opens?

Postby WeeeZer14 » Tue Dec 11, 2012 5:16 pm

I've put under construction roads in as dirt roads with a name including something like "under construction".
iPhone 5s (AT&T) • iOS 7.0.3 • Waze 3.7.6.0
Image
✰ Mega Driver ✰ Mega Mapper ✰ 1M Points ✰
Country Manager: USA • Regional Coordinator: USA South Atlantic (KY, TN, NC, SC)
Navigation/Routing ExpertForum Moderator
WeeeZer14
 
Posts: 3761
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 3:27 pm
Location: Knoxville, TN, USA
Has thanked: 46 times
Been thanked: 316 times

Re: Should a new freeway be mapped before it opens?

Postby lakeyboy » Wed Dec 12, 2012 2:22 am

Thanks guys, I've decided to leave the freeway in place, but I've changed the road type from freeways and ramps to private roads, so when it opens, it can be quickly changed back.
Proud Melburnian and Australian Country Manager.
Map edits: 301,300+ | Distance travelled: 92,720km+ | Reports made: 2540+
Waze Australia Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/WazeAustralia
lakeyboy
Australia Waze Champs
Australia Waze Champs
 
Posts: 547
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 5:19 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Has thanked: 152 times
Been thanked: 259 times

Should a new freeway be mapped before it opens?

Postby lakeyboy » Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:34 pm

Tried looking for an answer for this but the most info I could find was construction zones within existing roads.

A fellow area manager in my area has mapped a brand new freeway which is currently being constructed and is scheduled to open in a few months. They have done the right thing by not joining the new freeway segments with existing road segments but is it generally seen as bad practice mapping roads under construction before they officially open? The way I see it is that it can confuse users into thinking there is a freeway there that they can take (even though Waze won't route them onto it). Opinions on if I should leave it, modify it or delete it?

And a editor link for those who are interested: https://world.waze.com/editor/?zoom=0&l ... TTTTTTTTFT
Proud Melburnian and Australian Country Manager.
Map edits: 301,300+ | Distance travelled: 92,720km+ | Reports made: 2540+
Waze Australia Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/WazeAustralia
lakeyboy
Australia Waze Champs
Australia Waze Champs
 
Posts: 547
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 5:19 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Has thanked: 152 times
Been thanked: 259 times

Re: Should a new freeway be mapped before it opens?

Postby jondrush » Wed Dec 12, 2012 8:51 pm

Private should do. Then the name will show in the client.
Keeping the Waze maps tidy since 2009
jondrush User Page
Image
jondrush
Waze Global Champs
Waze Global Champs
 
Posts: 2656
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:20 pm
Location: South Eastern Pennsylvania, USA
Has thanked: 192 times
Been thanked: 529 times

Re: Should a new freeway be mapped before it opens?

Postby jondrush » Wed Dec 12, 2012 8:37 pm

I put a highway under construction on the map because the construction workers were using Waze.
Keeping the Waze maps tidy since 2009
jondrush User Page
Image
jondrush
Waze Global Champs
Waze Global Champs
 
Posts: 2656
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:20 pm
Location: South Eastern Pennsylvania, USA
Has thanked: 192 times
Been thanked: 529 times

Re: Should a new freeway be mapped before it opens?

Postby jasonh300 » Thu Dec 13, 2012 4:52 pm

CBenson wrote:Are we saying that parking lot names don't show in the client, because I don't think that's true. My understanding was that parking lot roads were used for HOV lanes before private roads had the routing penalty. Private would make sense if starting from scratch, but I don't see much reason to go back and change the current parking lot segments to private road segments.


Parking Lot roads definitely show a name. The only ones I've seen that don't show a name are Ramps and Dirt Roads.
jasonh300
EmeritusChamps
EmeritusChamps
 
Posts: 7568
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2011 4:26 pm
Location: New Orleans, LA, USA
Has thanked: 407 times
Been thanked: 976 times

Re: Should a new freeway be mapped before it opens?

Postby jasonh300 » Wed Dec 12, 2012 3:37 am

lakeyboy wrote:Thanks guys, I've decided to leave the freeway in place, but I've changed the road type from freeways and ramps to private roads, so when it opens, it can be quickly changed back.


The point of Dirt Roads is that they appear as a very thin gray line in the client, so if you look closely, you can see it there, but it's not distracting, and certainly wouldn't be confused with an operating Freeway.

(Personally, I use Pedestrian Boardwalk for that sort of thing, to make it additionally unrouteable and almost invisible, but still always remember not to connect these to any live roads)
jasonh300
EmeritusChamps
EmeritusChamps
 
Posts: 7568
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2011 4:26 pm
Location: New Orleans, LA, USA
Has thanked: 407 times
Been thanked: 976 times

Re: Should a new freeway be mapped before it opens?

Postby harling » Tue Dec 11, 2012 2:04 pm

IMO, mapping the roads under construction is fine, provided they are visibly (in the client) disconnected from the rest of the map, and ideally labeled to indicate that they are under construction. It shows that Waze maps are far more up-to-date than others'.
Image
Area Manager, Eastern MA & Southern NH. Country Manager, USA.
harling
 
Posts: 1736
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 8:42 pm
Location: Eastern MA
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 123 times

Re: Should a new freeway be mapped before it opens?

Postby Daknife » Wed Dec 12, 2012 9:01 pm

Utah recently had a 9 mile stretch of new highway open. I had it all mapped in but disconnected from roads in use until it opened. I had it locked aand specified as a street rather than a Hwy until just before it opened, then about a month before the scheduled opening I made the connections and upgraded it to the proper road type but left the turn restrictions. Then when the opening occurred I changed the turn restrictions. As others have noted I was seeing GPS tracks during construction.

The ability to have a new road ready and waiting when it opens is one of the things that first sold me on Waze, as at the time I found Waze I was driving every day on a new highway that had been open for a year and a half but was still at that time represented on my Tom Tom and even Google Maps didn't have a fully accurate representation of the road, Waze did. Shortly after I started using Waze another new road opened, it has yet to appear on my TomTom updates and Google took a couple months to add it. It was there when it opened.

Map it in, lock it to keep newbie editors from connecting it before the road opens, but map it in. The user editors are aware of changes to the local road systems far sooner than any map editing team in some random office halfway across the country will become aware of it. That is one of Waze's biggest strengths, compare it to the fiasco known as Apple Maps.
Last edited by Daknife on Thu Dec 13, 2012 7:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
AM in Utah; CM USA
Utah Forum: Utah Forum
Samsung Galaxy S4 running 4.4 KitKat on Sprint
Daknife
Waze Mentor
Waze Mentor
 
Posts: 1683
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2011 11:03 pm
Location: Riverdale, Utah
Has thanked: 455 times
Been thanked: 229 times

Re: Should a new freeway be mapped before it opens?

Postby cherianchris » Wed Dec 12, 2012 9:12 pm

Bang on Target!
+1

MB526 - > Tapatalk 2
“It is not power that corrupts but fear. Fear of losing power corrupts those who wield it and fear of the scourge of power corrupts those who are subject to it.” Image Image
cherianchris
EmeritusChamps
EmeritusChamps
 
Posts: 576
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 2:31 pm
Location: Chennai, India
Has thanked: 31 times
Been thanked: 82 times

Next

Return to Waze Map Editor

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot]