Also a new user of Waze on Android for a week now, I thought I'd share my considerations here too...
I love the concept of Waze, of having a free navigation system that works in my area in the first place, but also of the community improving the map and routing. So I started using it enthusiastically, navigating around and improving the map wherever I could. The game aspect is not really something I'd look for or expect to use, although I must admit I felt some excitement when I picked up points
The map in my area is not great, and in some nearby areas I travel in even virtually non-existent, but that's not a complaint in itself. The beauty of the community is that it will add roads as waze gains in popularity, and I'd be more than willing to play a substantial part in that myself. What ís a problem however, is that searches for an address from my contact list are never resolved, so that I have to look up where I want to go on the map and then navigate there. That is annoying, since I depend on navigation the most when I have no idea where my destination is in the first place. I found out that letting google maps locate the address for me (which always works), then switching to street view, then choosing "go to map", I could choose Waze as the app I wanted to use to go there, thus bypassing the need for letting Waze resolve the address. Not a great solution, but I guess I could live with it.
My biggest concern, however, is the openness of the community. Changes I made to the map that have to be confirmed by area managers have been waiting for that for over a week now. I understand that they are volunteers just like the rest of us and may be on holiday or too busy otherwise, but it did take away my initial enthusiasm to start thinking about what I was doing and for whom.
Bottom line is that I would be improving the map for Waze only, in the hope that Waze will be the best navigation option for me now and in the future. I'd much prefer to contribute to the Open Street Map, which is both superior and open. Waze does however not make use of OSM exactly because it would have to share map improvements (not including traffic information, routes and driving speeds). Given its closed nature, Waze would be an alternative only if the map quality at least comes close to that of OSM, with the added value of better routing from the gathered traffic information, routes and speeds. I have nothing against Waze earning money from my travel data, but to have me put an active effort in contributing to a map that is inferior exactly because Waze has no interest in contributing itself is a bit much to ask. It would really have to come with some extraordinary benefit such as offline navigation for that to become an option.
So, I've found my alternative, free, OSM based (plus contributing) and working directly from my contact list addresses. I think Waze would be a real winner if it could combine those features with the added benefits of gathering user data, which I think would be valueable enough in itself to build a business upon.
I love the concept of Waze, of having a free navigation system that works in my area in the first place, but also of the community improving the map and routing. So I started using it enthusiastically, navigating around and improving the map wherever I could. The game aspect is not really something I'd look for or expect to use, although I must admit I felt some excitement when I picked up points
The map in my area is not great, and in some nearby areas I travel in even virtually non-existent, but that's not a complaint in itself. The beauty of the community is that it will add roads as waze gains in popularity, and I'd be more than willing to play a substantial part in that myself. What ís a problem however, is that searches for an address from my contact list are never resolved, so that I have to look up where I want to go on the map and then navigate there. That is annoying, since I depend on navigation the most when I have no idea where my destination is in the first place. I found out that letting google maps locate the address for me (which always works), then switching to street view, then choosing "go to map", I could choose Waze as the app I wanted to use to go there, thus bypassing the need for letting Waze resolve the address. Not a great solution, but I guess I could live with it.
My biggest concern, however, is the openness of the community. Changes I made to the map that have to be confirmed by area managers have been waiting for that for over a week now. I understand that they are volunteers just like the rest of us and may be on holiday or too busy otherwise, but it did take away my initial enthusiasm to start thinking about what I was doing and for whom.
Bottom line is that I would be improving the map for Waze only, in the hope that Waze will be the best navigation option for me now and in the future. I'd much prefer to contribute to the Open Street Map, which is both superior and open. Waze does however not make use of OSM exactly because it would have to share map improvements (not including traffic information, routes and driving speeds). Given its closed nature, Waze would be an alternative only if the map quality at least comes close to that of OSM, with the added value of better routing from the gathered traffic information, routes and speeds. I have nothing against Waze earning money from my travel data, but to have me put an active effort in contributing to a map that is inferior exactly because Waze has no interest in contributing itself is a bit much to ask. It would really have to come with some extraordinary benefit such as offline navigation for that to become an option.
So, I've found my alternative, free, OSM based (plus contributing) and working directly from my contact list addresses. I think Waze would be a real winner if it could combine those features with the added benefits of gathering user data, which I think would be valueable enough in itself to build a business upon.
Re: Waze use case - the good, bad and ugly