This is the place to discuss issues that are relevant for locations in the US. For any other discussions, please use the main forums.

Post Reply

Ramp Meter mapping

Post by Lonewolf147
Ramp meters have been around for a while, but only in a few limited ares. I live in Milwaukee, WI, which is one of the places that use them.

I'm looking to set a standard for mapping these, but wanted to open up the discussion to the US and get some more input before trying to get it written into the wiki (either State or National level).

What I propose is to add a Junction at the point of the meter lights. Then, the remainder of the ramp after the lights have the name removed. I have a couple in town that I'm testing it with. Here's an example: https://www.waze.com/editor/?env=usa&lo ... 2,86792403

The purpose of the junction would then be to collect accurate speed data before and after the light to help with navigation, especially during rush hour.

The purpose of removing the name on the remainder of the ramp is to help protect that junction from being deleted by any of the automatic scripts, or even an editor that doesn't know why it's there. (since the two segments aren't named the same, it shouldn't allow you to delete the junction or merge/bridge the segments)

Thoughts? Good idea, bad idea? Problems/concerns?
Lonewolf147
Posts: 374
Has thanked: 173 times
Been thanked: 128 times

POSTER_ID:207627

1

Send a message

Post by CBenson
I'm on the fence here. On one hand, I can't really refute tonestertm's logic. On the other hand, if is the complete truth, then I don't understand why we are junctioning railroad segments to the road network.

Quite awhile ago when there were still many complaints about "Are you in traffic" prompts when sitting at traffic lights, some staff member told us that waze filters out the slowest 50 meters of a segment for traffic detection purposes. (There has been a lot that has changed since then.) There was thus talk about breaking segments when the slowest 50 meters was not at the end of a segment. Thus there were proposals to add the node as you suggest, so that you would not get a "Are you in traffic" prompt at the traffic meter light. But if I recall correctly, the general consensus was not to do this. I don't remember the details, but maybe we thought that traffic meter lights might be an acceptable place to be given an "Are you in traffic" prompt.
CBenson
EmeritusChamps
EmeritusChamps
Posts: 10330
Has thanked: 608 times
Been thanked: 1642 times
Send a message
Regional Coordinator: Mid-Atlantic, US
Verizon, Nexus 6, Android 6.0.1, Waze 4.7.0.902

Post by Lonewolf147
The time of waiting at the light is included in the time of transit for the ramp (complex).
That completely slipped my mind when considering this.
Lonewolf147
Posts: 374
Has thanked: 173 times
Been thanked: 128 times
Send a message

Post by Lonewolf147
subs5 wrote:Are you having any problems with routing?
No problems, that I can see. My thought was that if congestion on a ramp was better tracked, it would help to route drivers away from those ramps and onto the highways at different locations.

As Tony mentioned, Waze is looking at the total transit time from start to finish of the segment. Which should be enough to show the congestion and initiate a re-route if warranted.
Lonewolf147
Posts: 374
Has thanked: 173 times
Been thanked: 128 times
Send a message

Post by Lonewolf147
nzahn1 wrote:I have not empirical evidence to support this claim, but anecdotally: I've never been asked "Are you in traffic" on any ramp-typed road segment. Maybe the entire road type has the prompt disabled?
I have never been prompted for that on a ramp either.
Lonewolf147
Posts: 374
Has thanked: 173 times
Been thanked: 128 times
Send a message

Post by nzahn1
I have no empirical evidence to support this claim, but anecdotally: I've never been asked "Are you in traffic" on any ramp-typed road segment. Maybe the entire road type has the prompt disabled?
nzahn1
Waze Global Champs
Waze Global Champs
Posts: 1761
Has thanked: 642 times
Been thanked: 776 times
Send a message
Last edited by nzahn1 on Wed Mar 02, 2016 12:01 am, edited 1 time in total.

US Global Champ | MAR Coordinator | iOS Beta | WME Beta | Localizer
WME Profile | E-mail | MAR Forum | MAR Wiki | MD Twitter

Post by SkyviewGuru
I am not aware of any metered ramps in Idaho, but I've encountered some in Utah before. I can see your reasoning behind it. I cannot think of any problems that would occur from implementing this in this way. I'd be good with it.

EDIT:
As I think about it more, and consider @tonestertm's response, I think I answered too quickly. Waze will monitor the speeds of the ramp as a whole in its determination of whether the ramp is a good route or not. During times of metering, the ramp as a whole will be slower. If metering is off, the ramp traffic will move faster.

It does not seem it would improve routing to junction it. It would give Waze speed/traffic data for how long a merge takes after having been metered, but I don't know if that is data they really need for anything.
SkyviewGuru
State Manager
State Manager
Posts: 232
Has thanked: 293 times
Been thanked: 65 times
Send a message
Last edited by SkyviewGuru on Sun Feb 28, 2016 5:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
https://i.imgur.com/GmLPXzV.pnghttps://s.waze.tools/s0100.pnghttps://i.imgur.com/SPugkAE.pnghttps://s.waze.tools/c5s.png
Idaho State Manager :: Northwest Region USA and Utah Area Manager
Waze Beta Leader (Android) :: WME Beta Tester :: Formal Mentoring 2.0 Mentor
PNH Moderator and Cross-Region Collaboration Liaison for Northwest Region USA

Post by subs5
Are you having any problems with routing? I don't see any with the ramp meters in the Northern Virginia/DC/Baltimore area.
To me it is basically a stop light that occasionally is on. Similar to when a small town turns off a stop light at night and goes to a flashing yellow on the primary street and flashing red on the secondary street.
The speed history portion of the algorithm should take care of it automatically. I would think that the junction that you add is unnecessary. There is a list of why to have a junction between two straight segments and this is not one of those reasons. I know that Speed Limits needs to be added to that list and I submitted that change a while ago and it is in process.
subs5
Country Manager
Country Manager
Posts: 2733
Answers: 3
Has thanked: 756 times
Been thanked: 856 times
Send a message
Last edited by subs5 on Sun Feb 28, 2016 6:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Post by tonestertm
Almost all of our ramps are metered here. There's no need to add a junction or to do anything special. The time of waiting at the light is included in the time of transit for the ramp (complex). Just make sure the onramp junctions at the proper merge point on the freeway, where people are actually able to join the traffic flow, if there is a slow merge. We have one particular spot where, during rush, people don't merge until the very last point they possibly can. This needs to be included in the ramp time, otherwise the ramp looks faster than it should be.
tonestertm
US Waze Champs
US Waze Champs
Posts: 1441
Has thanked: 441 times
Been thanked: 836 times
Send a message
https://dl.dropbox.com/s/y7f2gsiomkpxbe6/CA_SM_Rocket_Shear_Alpha_50.png?dl=0
ARC for SW Region, USA
Global Champ, US Local Champ
The best editors Read the Wiki and read it often. Learn the proper way to handle URs. Don't draw another Place until you read this!

Post by tonestertm
FWIW, I don't believe I've ever received an "Are you in traffic?" prompt while sitting through even some fairly long and slow metered ramps.
tonestertm
US Waze Champs
US Waze Champs
Posts: 1441
Has thanked: 441 times
Been thanked: 836 times
Send a message
https://dl.dropbox.com/s/y7f2gsiomkpxbe6/CA_SM_Rocket_Shear_Alpha_50.png?dl=0
ARC for SW Region, USA
Global Champ, US Local Champ
The best editors Read the Wiki and read it often. Learn the proper way to handle URs. Don't draw another Place until you read this!