Whatcha think: mess of campus buildings

Image This is the place to discuss issues that are relevant for locations in the US. For any other discussions, please use the main forums.

Moderator: MapSir

Re: Whatcha think: mess of campus buildings

Postby AndyPoms » Wed Oct 09, 2013 12:00 am

daknife wrote:I'm with Andy on this, the guidelines are a single landmark for the University.
:shock: We agree on something?!?!?
Image
Waze Champ & Forum Moderator
USA Country Manager
Senior Area Manager: State of Connecticut
Wiki: Editing | Best Practices | FAQ
AndyPoms
Waze Global Champs
Waze Global Champs
 
Posts: 7067
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 1:34 pm
Location: Hartford, CT
Has thanked: 127 times
Been thanked: 1284 times

Re: Whatcha think: mess of campus buildings

Postby sketch » Wed Oct 09, 2013 12:02 am

I'm not saying I think it should be the rule, just saying I don't mind it.

But, good point, I do think that major college sports stadiums should be included.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2
ALL US EDITORS READ: New USA road type guidance
new orleans based • detroit enthusiast • usa country manager
2013 ford focus titanium hatchback 5mt • performance blue
Image Image
sketch
Waze Global Champs
Waze Global Champs
 
Posts: 5664
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 6:13 pm
Location: New Orleans, LA
Has thanked: 1227 times
Been thanked: 1685 times

Re: Whatcha think: mess of campus buildings

Postby foxitrot » Wed Oct 09, 2013 7:00 am

AlanOfTheBerg wrote:PhysicsDave havin' some fun: https://www.waze.com/editor/?zoom=5&lat ... =-84.46323

:shock: Why am I able to see just one ancient single segment far and wide: https://www.waze.com/editor/?zoom=4&lat ... s=57645047 - Got the area cleaned up by someone?
[edit] OK, got it - World vs. US & Canada only. I didn't know that the INTL server contained ANY segments at the US territory?

sketch wrote:... I just don't think it's a terrible idea.

While testing various landmark combinations and configurations, I've mapped a few such areas with a thin named landmark snake "along the fence line", additionally the buildings with reasonably short names (where part of the name could be contained in the "main" landmark). Looked usably IMHO - each important building was visible with its name and the whole area was also visible including its floating name.
...with the good old crashing :roll: Symbian 2.1.99.114 (N-E52), while
trying to get used to the good new social Android 4.0.xx.yyy (OP-X LOL-a-popp).
foxitrot
Waze Global Champs
Waze Global Champs
 
Posts: 6631
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 10:22 pm
Location: Slovakia
Has thanked: 1927 times
Been thanked: 873 times

Re: Whatcha think: mess of campus buildings

Postby Riamus » Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:02 pm

I think it comes down to what was said already... the entire campus is a landmark and the individual buildings are POIs. Waze will be adding points of interest, so we should not promote adding landmarks for places that will be POIs. That just means a lot of editing to remove all of those later. Also, as pointed out, names will tend to float around so they don't overlap. I have seen the current road name appear on another road because of this and that can cause people to make incorrect turns.

And until Waze provide the option of using it for walking/biking, we shouldn't be promoting anything that makes people think it's fine to use Waze when you aren't driving as that just messes up speed data and generates MPs. If you're providing a lot of landmarks for things you have to walk to, then you're promoting using it while walking and that just doesn't sound like a good idea to me. I already see GPS marks throughout parks and down rivers and across lakes. Thankfully most of those aren't near enough to roads to matter, but that isn't really what Waze is for. At least, not currently.
ImageImage
Area Manager: Michigan - Northern LP.
Waze running on Samsung Galaxy S3.
Riamus
 
Posts: 1043
Joined: Sun May 05, 2013 7:34 pm
Location: Summerfield, NC
Has thanked: 66 times
Been thanked: 234 times

Re: Whatcha think: mess of campus buildings

Postby foxitrot » Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:03 pm

Riamus wrote:If you're providing a lot of landmarks for things you have to walk to, then you're promoting using it while walking and that just doesn't sound like a good idea to me.

OTOH you can also be providing a lot of landmarks for things you have to drive to. Campuses are not necessarily identical, some have large common parking lots and you finally have to walk to the target building through the mentioned parks, others have own small (underground / roof) parking directly at the target.
...with the good old crashing :roll: Symbian 2.1.99.114 (N-E52), while
trying to get used to the good new social Android 4.0.xx.yyy (OP-X LOL-a-popp).
foxitrot
Waze Global Champs
Waze Global Champs
 
Posts: 6631
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 10:22 pm
Location: Slovakia
Has thanked: 1927 times
Been thanked: 873 times

Re: Whatcha think: mess of campus buildings

Postby bgodette » Tue Oct 15, 2013 5:43 am

foxitrot wrote:OTOH you can also be providing a lot of landmarks for things you have to drive to. Campuses are not necessarily identical, some have large common parking lots and you finally have to walk to the target building through the mentioned parks, others have own small (underground / roof) parking directly at the target.
However handy that currently is, it's basically a "hack" due to Waze's lack of POI handling. I currently have such landmarks for DIA's arrivals and departure points for the east and west sides of the airport so that people get routed correctly (east side only, OMG cluster %$#% for west side due to light rail construction), but I'd much rather have real POI support.
ImageImage
bgodette
Waze Global Champs
Waze Global Champs
 
Posts: 3367
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 8:19 pm
Location: Denver, CO
Has thanked: 101 times
Been thanked: 478 times

Re: Whatcha think: mess of campus buildings

Postby foxitrot » Tue Oct 15, 2013 6:55 am

Sure. The whole Waze has always been about utilizing what's available and hacking around what's broken (despite the promises and plans) in order to fulfill the need for an useful and functional navigation. A half-transparent POI with proper navigation point (or at least a bottom-most landmark (why do they still not allow to specify their vertical ordering?)) would be preferred.
...with the good old crashing :roll: Symbian 2.1.99.114 (N-E52), while
trying to get used to the good new social Android 4.0.xx.yyy (OP-X LOL-a-popp).
foxitrot
Waze Global Champs
Waze Global Champs
 
Posts: 6631
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 10:22 pm
Location: Slovakia
Has thanked: 1927 times
Been thanked: 873 times

Previous

Return to United States

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users