This forum is a place to discuss new ideas and also new wiki updates will be placed here.
Thu Mar 12, 2015 7:51 pm
Heel goed stuk. Veel beter dan de guide die ik een maand of 6 geleden heb gelezen.
2 opmerkingen :
1 spelfout denk ik in: "Otherwise, you might as well get overfeed with information" overfeed moet zijn overfed.
2 het deel over walking trails en PB 's kan mi een stuk compacter. Heb nu het idee dat sommige dingen er dubbel instaan.
Sent from HTC_M8
Sat Mar 21, 2015 2:25 pm
Wat mij betreft ook ok
Sun Mar 01, 2015 10:00 am
Anticipating the restructuring of the international Wiki pages, I have a proposal for the English basic version of the BeNeLux Beginner Guide. It is renamed to parallel the international page. Please have a look and put your comments here as a reply:BeNeLux Map Editing Quick-start Guide
Fri Mar 13, 2015 9:22 pm
It is always difficult to decide what needs in and what needs to be left out for this phase. Happy to hear your comments. I'm awaiting other comments for now.
Wed Mar 18, 2015 10:14 pm
Wed Mar 18, 2015 10:17 pm
Dutchdirt wrote:1 spelfout denk ik in: "Otherwise, you might as well get overfeed with information" overfeed moet zijn overfed.
Dutchdirt wrote:2 het deel over walking trails en PB 's kan mi een stuk compacter. Heb nu het idee dat sommige dingen er dubbel instaan.
stelling28 wrote:The sentences '(only if one of the above arguments count)' look a little bit strange to me. Personally I would replace them with a sentence like: Only add PB (or WT) if one of the above arguments apply. So without parenthesis.
It seems better to get this part out here, and correct the sentences in the detailed description (to do)
Wed Mar 18, 2015 10:23 pm
stelling28 wrote:Further for PB's a learned from an experienced editor in the forum not to remove PB's, also not when the arguments don't apply. Better correct them, if needed. Reason is that every level 1 can add them again and someone probably will. So better correct them and leave them. Is that something to add to this guide?
It is difficult to choose a method. The disadvantage of this method is that if you leave them, others will copy the example and don't understand why it is better not to do it. I just deleted about 46 roads from a user who explained it was a necessary addition because of learning his daughter how to get to school on her bicycle - I''m afraid that the consequences in the end, i.e., contamination of the speed data because of cycling with Waze on, do more harm. i personally rather delete added roads, and explain why.
Thu Mar 19, 2015 11:39 am
I think it maybe even would be better to add it to https://wiki.waze.com/wiki/Benelux_Pedestrian_Boardwalk
and keep the descriptions in the other docs short
Sat Mar 21, 2015 8:24 am
de hierin genoemde aanpassingen zijn verwerkt.
Kan de pagina nu 'live' gaan?
Sun Mar 29, 2015 7:46 am
The page is published. This topic will be closed. Please give your new remarks in this topic
De pagina is gepubliceerd. Eventuele opmerkingen kunnen in het nieuwe topic worden geplaatst.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.