Speed Bumps

Moderator: Unholy

Speed Bumps

Postby Saltyone » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:48 am

I understand at the moment that there is not a method (even map editing) that would allow a user to warn other users that streets are loaded with speed bumps. I would like to suggest that Waze resolve this by allowing users to edit the map to indicate speed bumps. I recently had the unfortunate circumstance to be on a route (inner city) where the entire route kept me on one street for 3.5 miles each of the alternative routes also were speed bumps its a residential area but there are streets that do not have these bumps and it would be nice if Waze could point those streets out. Nothing like bouncing down the road at 5 miles an hour to make your day. Thanks :twisted:
Saltyone
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 11:30 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: Speed Bumps

Postby WeeeZer14 » Mon Feb 25, 2013 4:11 pm

Or a leased company car as opposed to my personal car :twisted:
WeeeZer14
 
Posts: 3761
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 3:27 pm
Location: Knoxville, TN, USA
Has thanked: 46 times
Been thanked: 316 times

Re: Speed Bumps

Postby Daknife » Sun Feb 24, 2013 1:02 am

xteejx wrote:Or if you're in a van and can go straight over them ;-)

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2

Or a truck. Speed bumps don't bother me much. :lol:
Daknife
Waze Mentor
Waze Mentor
 
Posts: 1683
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2011 11:03 pm
Location: Riverdale, Utah
Has thanked: 456 times
Been thanked: 229 times

Re: Speed Bumps

Postby floppyrod84 » Sun Feb 24, 2013 12:43 am

Or if you're in a van and can go straight over them ;-)

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
floppyrod84
 
Posts: 2569
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:17 pm
Location: Sheerness, Kent, UK
Has thanked: 46 times
Been thanked: 45 times

Re: Speed Bumps

Postby harling » Sun Feb 24, 2013 12:29 am

The only situation I can think of in which Waze doesn't already handle "speed bumps" as desired, is when a driver would rather avoid speed bumps even when that means taking an even slower route; e.g.:
[ img ]
:lol:
harling
 
Posts: 1736
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 8:42 pm
Location: Eastern MA
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 123 times

Re: Speed Bumps

Postby Daknife » Sun Feb 24, 2013 12:17 am

Kulg wrote:I think that just Speed Bumps should be entered.

The streets that have these speed bumps are not that busy because of the bumps so the statistical data isn't that good for them. For this same reason I see Waze recommending speed-bump ridden routes to me all the time which makes the routing frustrating and counter productive. As an example on my way home every day there is a road that sees little traffic because it has 16 speed bumps! Waze recommends it most days as their isn't much traffic on it. Due to the low traffic stats don't show it as a slow route but with all those speed bumps its way slower than alternate routes in heavy traffic. (I actually measured & compared this route in particular).

So in short I think Waze will be a better routing system working far more accurately if speed bumps are taken into account and routes known to be slower with them.

You are ignoring the fact that Waze will determine and very accurately that those routes with speed bumps are slower. Just because they are residential areas does not mean they are not getting used by Wazers, Wazers too have homes. Speed bumps slow traffic down as designed. They are not hazards, and there is no reason or benefit to mapping them. It only takes one driver going down a road to establish historical data showing that driver had an average speed less than 25 mph while the nearby faster road averages 30 mph or more. And sometimes those slow routes turn out to be faster due to congestion. More drives will firm up that data but it only takes one. I could almost support a warning for speed dips because those will trash your suspension if you don't take them slow. But even those aren't worth adding another item to be tracked and monitored.
Daknife
Waze Mentor
Waze Mentor
 
Posts: 1683
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2011 11:03 pm
Location: Riverdale, Utah
Has thanked: 456 times
Been thanked: 229 times

Re: Speed Bumps

Postby floppyrod84 » Sun Feb 24, 2013 12:11 am

You could just slow down and be a more observant driver...

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
floppyrod84
 
Posts: 2569
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:17 pm
Location: Sheerness, Kent, UK
Has thanked: 46 times
Been thanked: 45 times

Re: Speed Bumps

Postby javieruriona » Sat Feb 23, 2013 10:36 pm

Hi everyone,

I am also new to waze and I find it an amazing tool to drive because of the collaboration between the community. Therefore, I believe somehow we should keep improving this tool. I also agree that we should have some sort of "sign" to let us know in advance where we are going to find Speed Bumps, here in Lima they don't only slow you down, they are most of the times a real danger for the car, no matter how slow you would be, besides that, almost all the time an street sign, warning about it, is missing, and it causes serious accidents. So I also ask the programer's team to add a "street bump sign", in which we the users could let the others know if it is a minor one or a really dangerous one.

Thank you for your work,

Greetings.
javieruriona
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2013 3:37 am
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Speed Bumps

Postby Kulg » Thu Jan 10, 2013 7:48 am

I think that just Speed Bumps should be entered.

The streets that have these speed bumps are not that busy because of the bumps so the statistical data isn't that good for them. For this same reason I see Waze recommending speed-bump ridden routes to me all the time which makes the routing frustrating and counter productive. As an example on my way home every day there is a road that sees little traffic because it has 16 speed bumps! Waze recommends it most days as their isn't much traffic on it. Due to the low traffic stats don't show it as a slow route but with all those speed bumps its way slower than alternate routes in heavy traffic. (I actually measured & compared this route in particular).

So in short I think Waze will be a better routing system working far more accurately if speed bumps are taken into account and routes known to be slower with them.

palmerit wrote:I think the point being made is:

Speed bumps serve one purpose. To keep traffic slow. As soon as Waze has enough statistical data about the road, it'll already determine that the road is slow and route you along faster roads. In a nutshell, Waze doesn't (and shouldn't) know WHY its slower, just that it is.

Think about it. If we start with speedbumps, where does it end? Its just more data to enter, verify, cross reference, and maintain for no real additional value.

Should we mark pot holes? Stop signs? School zones? Pedestrian crosswalks? Puma crossings? Etc. Etc. You get the point. The system just needs to learn the average speeds.

Sent from my Kindle Fire using Tapatalk 2
Kulg
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 9:18 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: Speed Bumps

Postby Scorp42 » Thu Jan 10, 2013 7:03 am

I think the point being made is:

Speed bumps serve one purpose. To keep traffic slow. As soon as Waze has enough statistical data about the road, it'll already determine that the road is slow and route you along faster roads. In a nutshell, Waze doesn't (and shouldn't) know WHY its slower, just that it is.

Think about it. If we start with speedbumps, where does it end? Its just more data to enter, verify, cross reference, and maintain for no real additional value.

Should we mark pot holes? Stop signs? School zones? Pedestrian crosswalks? Puma crossings? Etc. Etc. You get the point. The system just needs to learn the average speeds.

Sent from my Kindle Fire using Tapatalk 2
Scorp42
 
Posts: 225
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2011 9:21 pm
Location: Southwest Florida
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 5 times

Next

Return to Website, Community, General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

cron