OMG, someone finally got it! Yea!!!!Bozwell wrote:There are a lot of mapping apps out there for hiking, cycling etc. Best to use a tool that is intended for that use rather than change a driving aid such as Waze.
+1
+1
+1
OMG, someone finally got it! Yea!!!!Bozwell wrote:There are a lot of mapping apps out there for hiking, cycling etc. Best to use a tool that is intended for that use rather than change a driving aid such as Waze.
During GPS track post-processing, if part of a GPS track:Bozwell wrote:Yes it's easy to automatically determine that someone isn't walking at 50mph, but it's not impossible for a car to crawl in traffic at 2mph. So how could this be determined automatically?
The point is not to make Waze a walking app; it is to protect the road statistics from the "pollution" resulting from leaving the app running while walking, without depending on Wazers to remember to turn off the app or set an appropriate mode.IMO it's unnecessary work for Waze to develop this kind of functionality when they will never do it to the same standard as a dedicated walking app of which there are many, and it would risk damaging the main function of Waze.
This exactly. Waze is for driving, don't change the focus. But we can't stop people from walking/biking/flying/or boating with Waze. Yes I've even seen people use Waze on boats. We need a "not driving" mode for those people.harling wrote: The point is not to make Waze a walking app; it is to protect the road statistics from the "pollution"
1,000,000% disagree:AlanOfTheBerg wrote:Waze has the potential to be used for other modes of transportation but as it stands, if used for biking or walking, it will only mess of the traffic data for drivers. Driving is where Waze should be used and no other mode of transportation.
Re: Walking Route Option