Tue Jun 06, 2017 11:57 pm
I think this is a clean, straight forward section.
Thu Jun 08, 2017 12:24 pm
I do agree with kent that if we can shorten the names as much as possible that would be a much better choice.
Thu Jun 15, 2017 3:50 pm
Sounds good to me.
Fri Mar 01, 2019 8:54 pm
How many times have we truly encountered when an Airport has taken up a large amount of space that something else on the map should have been in? Typically even the remote airports, are in areas where it is the only thing in the vicinity. I know a lot of people have the age old argument about area places around here, but what are we really cluttering up where an airport goes. I side with sketch in the fact that there isn't a reason to limit what an airport is.
Mon Mar 04, 2019 7:53 pm
I would say those descriptions cover just about most what has been brought up.
Mon Mar 04, 2019 11:25 pm
I realize I'm late to the party here, but reading back one I notice other advantage of the Airport AP in the app (in addition to basic orientation) that hasn't been mentioned. Seeing an AP for "XYZ Airport" can help users understand the low flying aircraft they may observe over the roadway, even (especially) when airport facilities are not directly visible to the user. I would suggest adding a clause to the proposed Scope paragraph for airports whose approach or departure routes immediately cross over roadways.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.