My efforts linked above to create separate guidance regarding the hazards of adding junction nodes -- to which this proposed addition to the RR guidance could easily refer -- are not working out at this time.
I appreciate there are aspects of my proposed change that could be considered vague and/or could use expansion. On the other hand the language proposed a few posts up (in the quote) is compact and I believe reasonably meaningful to most editors.
I'd like to go ahead with the proposed change to the RR section for now, because I think it's important that we have this caution in our guidance. As far as I know, new editors reading the current guidance are still under the impression that we want every grade crossing junctioned without exception, and as many of us here know, that is counterproductive.
Once the guidance is in place, we can continue to look for ways to improve it as always.
I appreciate there are aspects of my proposed change that could be considered vague and/or could use expansion. On the other hand the language proposed a few posts up (in the quote) is compact and I believe reasonably meaningful to most editors.
I'd like to go ahead with the proposed change to the RR section for now, because I think it's important that we have this caution in our guidance. As far as I know, new editors reading the current guidance are still under the impression that we want every grade crossing junctioned without exception, and as many of us here know, that is counterproductive.
Once the guidance is in place, we can continue to look for ways to improve it as always.
Re: [Page update] Road types - Railroad