I took the liberty to create a copy of your chart and added the headers (including a temp vert header). Updated Chart. I also updated a few elements in the table to simplify maintenance.
Cologne Blue
Modern
Monobook (Default)
Vector
According to MediaWiki the default skin has been Monobook since version 1.3.0.
Narrow columns are traditional for simplified reading by the average reader. Putting too much information on a single horizontal line of text is more difficult to follow from left to right.
I assume you know you can change your individual settings and see any page in that style. In the mean time how about:sketch wrote:Sort of wish I could use a different page as a sample, since the entire main page is set to the "smaller" font size
Cologne Blue
Modern
Monobook (Default)
Vector
I can take a look at it with the default size to see if I can improve readability if you like. I don't think I have found a Wiki page I could not make readable at any typeface or size.sketch wrote:I reverted the draft page to the default size with the exception of the caution box. The box was really difficult to follow in the default font size.
I actually thought Monobook was the Wikipedia default. I personally use Vector for Wikipedia, but I don't think that was the default over there, was it?sketch wrote:I wonder why Monobook is the default. I really don't know why all the text in it is so big. I've switched to Vector (which is what Wikipedia looks like) and I find the Wiki is a lot easier to read now.
The problem, of course, is that we have to design the Wiki for the default, and if I'm going to be doing any sort of format editing in the Wiki, I'm going to have to suck it up and use the Monobook theme. The combination of large text and large margins makes it quite cramped.
I didn't see that previous discussion of the Wiki's layout. Is there any reason we default to Monobook?
According to MediaWiki the default skin has been Monobook since version 1.3.0.
Narrow columns are traditional for simplified reading by the average reader. Putting too much information on a single horizontal line of text is more difficult to follow from left to right.
Re: Road Types (USA) – comprehensive overhaul of drivable ro