Thu Aug 25, 2016 3:09 pm
Fri Feb 20, 2015 12:24 am
Mon May 12, 2014 4:06 pm
Mon May 12, 2014 9:25 pm
Tue May 20, 2014 5:33 pm
nnote wrote:I have to give a shout out to my AZ team, after much debating the official state gov FC GIS, on April 30th we decided to go for it. Almost two weeks later of non stop editing, ------- AZ FC is completed! ----------
Wed May 28, 2014 4:10 pm
Fri Feb 20, 2015 6:22 am
Tue Feb 24, 2015 2:11 pm
Mon Feb 16, 2015 11:58 pm
sketch wrote:txemt wrote:voludu2 wrote:Then the style/best practice for this should also clearly state that any MPs which arise as a result should be closed "not identified", just to be clear that we aren't going to let an MP tell us what to do.
No, don't ever close an MP as "not identified." IGNs get involved then.
This is very old information. IGNs haven't edited segments in years. Not identified is correct for MPs. Think of it as "not a problem".
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Tue Feb 17, 2015 3:23 am
sketch wrote:jasonh300 wrote:I wouldn't say "years", but I was assured by an admin that the MPs would no longer be handled this way, which confirms (to me) that it was once handled that way. I can't find the emails now, but I believe the end result was that "not identified" now prevents that MP from appearing again.
I say "years" only because all the "Last edited by ign_*" seem to be from 2012. It may have been a bit less than that. Either way, I am sure I read that "not identified" now prevents the MP from reappearing over a year ago.