Wed Aug 03, 2016 8:45 pm
Fri Aug 05, 2016 5:32 pm
Fri Aug 05, 2016 7:39 pm
Tue Aug 30, 2016 6:05 am
Sun May 04, 2014 4:51 pm
Mon May 05, 2014 11:12 pm
Tue May 06, 2014 2:26 am
Thu Aug 18, 2016 12:40 am
voludu2 wrote:Me too. The concepts give me a framework to hang all the details on.
We all have different learning styles.
In the short term, I'd like to see the already-proposed draft accepted.
After that, we can fine-tune the presentation.
It is possible that we might want to organize some of the pages into "quick reference how-to" and a more detailed discussion with the "why". We would benefit from input from someone who knows something about learning and learning styles. I think a fair # of editors claim some kind of executive function deficit. The community benefits if it is able to make it easy for everyone to learn.
Wed Mar 19, 2014 5:10 pm
qwaletee wrote:Never a downgrade?
Tue Mar 18, 2014 7:53 am
PhantomSoul wrote:Maybe I have the objective of the road types totally wrong, but if they are for trying to single out roads appropriate for use in the middle of trips of certain distances, then urban arterials are a bad metaphor for Waze highways.
Functional class / highway system Waze road type FC: Interstates
FC: Other Freeways and Expressways (some)
Freeway FC: Other Freeways and Expressways (others)
FC: Other Principal Arterials
HS: U.S. Highways
Major Highway FC: Other Arterials
HS: State Highways
Minor Highway FC: Major Collectors
FC: Minor Collectors
HS: County Routes
Primary Street FC: Local Street