robin1979 wrote:ccdmas wrote:Daher habe ich auch die Vermutung, dass Ramps die Sache evtl. verhindern könnten. Wir könnten es ja ausprobieren...
Has been tried, same problems. Currently they are looking into it, so I would hold off any big changes for now.
What seems to happen is that the routing logic is selecting the next segment by favoring it by absolute cost (so 300m@50km/h=21.6s vs 1000m@115km/h=31.3s) while it should be preferring segments by relative cost.
Yeah, that would certainly explain it, if it only looks at the absolute time of the next segment, while ignoring it's length. Nasty bug though. That should have other bad effects on routing elsewhere.