Wajo357 wrote:this extension helped me...
http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/158050

Wajo357 wrote:
Discussion Topic 2 -
- I am a bit skeptical generating landmarks to follow one set of policies for one version of Waze to then change it in 1/2 a year for another version of Waze. Waze is now utilizing (in some countries) gas popups if you are within a Gas landmarks. Great feature! But that just proves that Waze has the ability to enhance this functionality with almost every landmark. So now (vs 1/2 a year ago) all gas stations should be landmarked to the fence-line. Which I'm fine with. I guess what I'm eluding to, is that I feel (especially with this beta), we should be more lenient with landmarks than stringent, as many users in that thread seem to show with their tone. Waze has the ability to really enhance this functionality and I'm eager to see where this goes; without people saying whether we should or should not landmark cemeteries (really? ).

Wajo357 wrote: Discussion Topic 1 - Anyone who wants an extension similar to http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/151766 but for Bing, I edited his extension. Let me know if you want the code and I'll email it to you. I'm waiting back from the user to give me permission to put it up on userscripts.

Wajo357 wrote:

orbitc wrote:202: I fixed this... I changed to Avenue 'N'. That's what we decided last. Please refer to forum regarding this discussion:
http://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php ... 60#p355850

missed the single quotes.

I thought we decided that when the whole city is already named one way, we weren't going to change one segment because of a different theory.

Wajo357 wrote:
All segments in Brooklyn say "Ave"

WeeeZer14 wrote:So I've finally been able to spend more than 10 minutes or less a day with Waze lately and I am slowly catching up on reading the forums. I am so glad to see that this thread is functioning quite well to address the miscellaneous issues found in NJ without me

WeeeZer14 wrote: RE: roads with the route number appended to the common name -- I noticed that on my own a few days ago and I've been talking to the editor responsible. He means well and knows that it will have to be undone in the future. I am personally concerned about setting a bad example for new editors. PMs are still on-going...

Wajo357 wrote:

orbitc wrote:I'll take a look at it.
Have you contact to the editor/editors who made those changes?

I can't tell who, since I don't think you can see who makes node changes, just segment changes.