Area Places should be used infrequently
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 1:59 am
As I scroll around Anchorage and the valley, I'm seeing a lot of Places for businesses and buildings being added as an Area Place. As I'm pretty new to this, I've done a lot of reading in the Wazeopedia, and according to US standards, Area Places should be used only in certain cases. In the long list of types of Places provided, only a few should be Areas.
https://wazeopedia.waze.com/wiki/USA/Pl ... a_or_Point
Generally only these should be areas: gas stations, airports, seaports, cemetery, college, covention center, fire department, hospital, prison, military, police station, school, stadium/arena, zoo, campground, golf course, park, ski area, state/national forest, river, lake.
Then also large visually distinctive landmarks, useful for orientation can also be mapped as areas.
I think the intention is to keep the areas displayed in the app useful for orientation, emergency services, and the like - not to display every building or office park in the app.
Now, I know I'm new, so maybe this is old info, and we should be doing it differently. So feel free to contribute to the discussion, and add current regional standards to the Alaska wiki, or fix the US one.
https://wazeopedia.waze.com/wiki/USA/Pl ... a_or_Point
Generally only these should be areas: gas stations, airports, seaports, cemetery, college, covention center, fire department, hospital, prison, military, police station, school, stadium/arena, zoo, campground, golf course, park, ski area, state/national forest, river, lake.
Then also large visually distinctive landmarks, useful for orientation can also be mapped as areas.
I think the intention is to keep the areas displayed in the app useful for orientation, emergency services, and the like - not to display every building or office park in the app.
A landmark Place is defined as a named, architecturally unique location, locally well known for its uncommon height or iconic exterior appearance, easily visible to and recognizable by passing drivers, that is visually and obviously unlike its immediate surroundings. Horizontal size alone, such as found in vast but nondescript office building complexes, does not qualify a location as a landmark. Nor does fame due to whatever goes on at or inside the location, especially if its exterior is unremarkable or poorly visible to passing drivers.
As of February 2015, it is not encouraged to map any structures built by and dedicated to single retailers as Area Places, regardless of how visually iconic.
Now, I know I'm new, so maybe this is old info, and we should be doing it differently. So feel free to contribute to the discussion, and add current regional standards to the Alaska wiki, or fix the US one.