Level 5 Unlocks - Ohio

Read the forum posting instructions.

If your country has a dedicated forum for unlocks or update requests. See this thread for details first.

Moderators: Unholy, bextein

Forum rules
BEFORE YOU POST HERE

Read these rules:
1. Use this forum ONLY if your country does not have a Dedicated Forum for update requests.
2. Read the forum posting instructions.

Re: Level 5 Unlocks - Ohio

Postby MisterMooCow » Fri Nov 23, 2012 6:38 pm

bz2012 wrote:At that time, I was informed by another CM that such intersections should ALWAYS be set so 'straight through' traffic was forbidden (if it was possible to do so without effecting other traffic).
The wiki still indicates this:
http://www.waze.com/wiki/index.php/Limi ... utor_Lanes


Hmm, I hadn't seen that. The wiki seems a bit inconsistent, though: this section (first "Con" of a ramp) says that there is a penalty for a ramp transition.

I've [re-]posted the question here to get some better visibility for it.
MisterMooCow
 
Posts: 626
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 11:05 pm
Location: oHIo
Has thanked: 72 times
Been thanked: 34 times

Re: Level 5 Unlocks - Ohio

Postby MisterMooCow » Fri Nov 23, 2012 6:49 am

bz2012 wrote:The first place I saw such complaints was in the middle of nowhere in Wyoming!
And, they were RECENT complaints, at the time, much less than a year ago.
I still run across 'recent' reports by users as I hunt for 'old ballons' to pop.


Average speeds on the segments, turn restrictions, hidden restrictions/connectivity, device GPS tracking, etc. all checked out and supported the proper routing? If this is still happening, it'd be really good to have folks look closely at them. Every time we've run across strange things like that in our area, someone was able to find something obscure causing the issue.
MisterMooCow
 
Posts: 626
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 11:05 pm
Location: oHIo
Has thanked: 72 times
Been thanked: 34 times

Re: Level 5 Unlocks - Ohio

Postby MisterMooCow » Wed Nov 21, 2012 10:26 pm

jondrush wrote:I think you will find it much worse in areas where freeways curve hard. Thus the ramp is actually a shorter route.


Are you actually running with "favor shorter distance over shorter time" set? If that's the case, then in the scenario you describe, taking the ramp is arguably the correct behavior.

In the default setting (favor shorter time), I would think that the average speed on the ramp would be dramatically lower and there would be the penalty of an intersection. After considering all that, if it is indeed still shorter time-wise to take the ramp, then -- again -- taking the ramp is arguably the correct behavior.

Do you have any [recent] examples of this happening?
MisterMooCow
 
Posts: 626
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 11:05 pm
Location: oHIo
Has thanked: 72 times
Been thanked: 34 times

Re: Level 5 Unlocks - Ohio

Postby MisterMooCow » Wed Nov 21, 2012 9:21 pm

jondrush wrote:There is really no need for the split road over the highway, but it should be OK. Make sure you restrict the straight across movement from off-ramp to on-ramp so Waze doesn't route people off the highway, as it sometimes does.


In this case, he didn't split it-- the segments have existed for several years.

On the ramp-to-ramp "turn" restriction-- does that really still happen? I find those particular artificial restrictions to be jarring -- when I'm making scans across areas and see them I have to zoom in and check each segment to make sure that they're correct. The faux restrictions have been absent from central Ohio Interstate (and other) ramps for at least a year (if not longer) and I've never seen a misroute (or any URs regarding same).

Perhaps it only happens in places where there are perennial/predictable traffic jams (with average speeds slower than the ramps) on the adjacent freeways? If that's the case, I'd rather see the restrictions added as-needed rather than across the board.


Jeff
MisterMooCow
 
Posts: 626
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 11:05 pm
Location: oHIo
Has thanked: 72 times
Been thanked: 34 times

Re: Level 5 Unlocks - Ohio

Postby khaytsus » Sun Nov 25, 2012 3:19 pm

I have seen waze route down a ramp as recent as 3-4 months ago, so I personally continue to put restrictions on these ramps when possible.

I also still see it at a left/right split up to a road have the user go left and turn right; another thing I often turn restrict.

I certainly wish I didn't "have" to do these things but otherwise routing is goofy sometimes.
USA Country Manager
Central Kentucky Area Manager
AT&T LG G2 (AOKP 4.4.4)
Nexus 7 2013 (Cm 13.1)
Image
khaytsus
 
Posts: 1248
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:43 pm
Location: Lexington, KY
Has thanked: 43 times
Been thanked: 84 times

Re: Level 5 Unlocks - Ohio

Postby jondrush » Wed Nov 21, 2012 10:14 pm

I think you will find it much worse in areas where freeways curve hard. Thus the ramp is actually a shorter route.
Keeping the Waze maps tidy since 2009
jondrush User Page
Image
jondrush
Waze Global Champs
Waze Global Champs
 
Posts: 4147
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:20 pm
Location: South Eastern Pennsylvania, USA
Has thanked: 194 times
Been thanked: 527 times

Re: Level 5 Unlocks - Ohio

Postby jondrush » Wed Nov 21, 2012 2:56 pm

There is really no need for the split road over the highway, but it should be OK. Make sure you restrict the straight across movement from off-ramp to on-ramp so Waze doesn't route people off the highway, as it sometimes does.
Keeping the Waze maps tidy since 2009
jondrush User Page
Image
jondrush
Waze Global Champs
Waze Global Champs
 
Posts: 4147
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:20 pm
Location: South Eastern Pennsylvania, USA
Has thanked: 194 times
Been thanked: 527 times

Re: Level 5 Unlocks - Ohio

Postby GizmoGuy411 » Wed Nov 21, 2012 9:38 pm

I have been wondering about the false restrictions too. Never experienced an issue or handled a related UR where the restriction did not exist.

Do we need to revisit this, or is it the issue as Jeff described?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Image

U.S. based Emeritus Global Champ
U.S. Local Champ
U.S. Country Manager
U.S. Great Lakes RC: IL, IN, MI, OH, WI
AM: NW OH, NE IN, SE MI
Wiki Profile
Verizon: Google Pixel XL & iPad "3"
GizmoGuy411
EmeritusChamps
EmeritusChamps
 
Posts: 2106
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 3:14 am
Location: NW Ohio, SE Michigan, NW Indiana tri-state area
Has thanked: 710 times
Been thanked: 458 times

Re: Level 5 Unlocks - Ohio

Postby GizmoGuy411 » Tue Nov 20, 2012 4:36 pm

Unlocked and locked as requested.

I'm not so sure that level 5 locks were necessary, as 3 should have been sufficient, but I locked them anyway.

Thanks for being to thorough with your request too.

It makes our lives easier.
Image

U.S. based Emeritus Global Champ
U.S. Local Champ
U.S. Country Manager
U.S. Great Lakes RC: IL, IN, MI, OH, WI
AM: NW OH, NE IN, SE MI
Wiki Profile
Verizon: Google Pixel XL & iPad "3"
GizmoGuy411
EmeritusChamps
EmeritusChamps
 
Posts: 2106
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 3:14 am
Location: NW Ohio, SE Michigan, NW Indiana tri-state area
Has thanked: 710 times
Been thanked: 458 times

Re: Level 5 Unlocks - Ohio

Postby bz2012 » Fri Nov 23, 2012 2:10 pm

jhfrontz wrote:
Average speeds on the segments, turn restrictions, hidden restrictions/connectivity, device GPS tracking, etc. all checked out and supported the proper routing? If this is still happening, it'd be really good to have folks look closely at them. Every time we've run across strange things like that in our area, someone was able to find something obscure causing the issue.

Interesting.
I will look more carefully next time. At that time, I was informed by another CM that such intersections should ALWAYS be set so 'straight through' traffic was forbidden (if it was possible to do so without effecting other traffic).
The wiki still indicates this:
http://www.waze.com/wiki/index.php/Limi ... utor_Lanes
State Manager, Louisiana
bz2012
Map Raider
Map Raider
 
Posts: 3031
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 4:32 pm
Location: Baton Rouge, La
Has thanked: 1378 times
Been thanked: 283 times

Next

Return to Update/Unlock requests

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users