DG567 wrote:jasonh300 wrote:I've been asking the developers to make the parking lot roads much less visible in the client...
That would be very good. Especially as some editors map every lane.
BlazeTool wrote:Here's hoping they do it. Personally, I'd like to see PL roads not display at all in the client and be their own layer in the editor that can be turned off. Visual clutter goes away, problem reports for parking lots can go away. Only drawbacks would be it's still data to be transferred to the client and the extra nodes could effect routing times. Not sure if there are ways to avoid that.
Den_in_USA wrote:AndyPoms wrote:Yes it would. Parking Lot Roads have special properties.Den_in_USA wrote:Would it be a problem if I created a parking lot road and called it a dirt road so that it appears different on the map?
1) The suppress automatic traffic jam reports
2) They carry a heavy routing penalty to prevent routing through a parking lot (into or out of is fine)
3) They help suppress automatically generated map problems (missing road)
Thanks, I will not do that. Any word about wether the future parking lot roads will be displayed differently on the map? They should at least be narrower.
daknife wrote:Taking the discussion behind closed doors, with no statement to that effect and leaving me with nothing to point new editors at has caused great frustration. I finally had to get one editor banned for a bit as he simply wasn't responding to any effort to get him to communicate, and he stated that lacking any set wiki instructions, he was just trying to mark all the landmarks the drop-down list let him mark.
Landmarks do not suppress traffic jams.
We do [have] plans to use this feature, but we didn't try it live yet.
Timbones wrote:davipt wrote:Here's a case of mall+plot example
I don't think the parking lot landmark in this example should be touching the Freeway. For one thing there's a huge green area separating the two.
jgilbrech wrote:So the gas station landmark only suppresses traffic when it is snapped to the road? In what situations would this be a desirable effect?
jgilbrech wrote:Also, I don't know who actually runs the "Waze Mapping Support" twitter account but I asked about the parking lot landmark before I came here to look.
"@WazeMapping Does the "parking lot" landmark have any use?"
"Limited use. That landmark was originally intended for public or pay lots, not every mall lot out there."
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot]