New Page - Tunnels

Moderator: Unholy

Re: New Page - Tunnels

Postby KB_Steveo » Mon Dec 28, 2015 5:44 pm

I don't have an issue calling it a tunnel, I'm just trying to start a dialogue. Something this short, do we need to click the checkbox, or is setting its elevation to -1 good enough, etc.

*edit* A dialogue that doesn't get lost in a GHO. :D
KB_Steveo
State Manager
State Manager
 
Posts: 317
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 5:26 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Has thanked: 57 times
Been thanked: 29 times

Re: New Page - Tunnels

Postby qwaletee » Mon Dec 28, 2015 5:55 am

I'd be OK with calling that a tunnel. What's the downside?
qwaletee
US Waze Champs
US Waze Champs
 
Posts: 2880
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:42 am
Location: NYC Metro - Active throughout NE^2 (Northeast & New England)
Has thanked: 229 times
Been thanked: 1114 times

Re: New Page - Tunnels

Postby KB_Steveo » Mon Dec 28, 2015 1:25 am

I also have a question. Do we have a minimum length for something to be considered a "tunnel". This is why I'm asking https://www.waze.com/editor/?env=usa&lo ... 413&zoom=6 Klondike Rd, in particular... a seagull could fly through that....
KB_Steveo
State Manager
State Manager
 
Posts: 317
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 5:26 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Has thanked: 57 times
Been thanked: 29 times

Re: New Page - Tunnels

Postby KB_Steveo » Mon Dec 28, 2015 1:22 am

Thread is over a year old. We should probably start a new one and fix the link in the wiki page mentioned in the last post now that the tunnel check box is in production.
KB_Steveo
State Manager
State Manager
 
Posts: 317
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 5:26 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Has thanked: 57 times
Been thanked: 29 times

Re: New Page - Tunnels

Postby kentsmith9 » Thu Aug 14, 2014 5:36 pm

I posted what we have so far into the Wiki on https://wiki.waze.com/wiki/Tunnels.

I did not add anything on Places, so if someone is more up to speed on the general plan for them, please consider commenting here and then adding it directly to the page.
kentsmith9
Waze Global Champs
Waze Global Champs
 
Posts: 5277
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:33 pm
Location: SF/SJ Bay Area of Northern California
Has thanked: 1380 times
Been thanked: 1595 times

Re: New Page - Tunnels

Postby datakoe » Thu Aug 14, 2014 6:01 am

Hi all,

there's another one interesting point from my experience. In Russia we have a local navigation system which uses the last noticed speed when you're entering the tunnel and tracking you accordingly the road on map. Surely the road already must be in place in order to track adequately. Perhaps something similar can be implemented into Waze?
So just a road marking isn't enough in any case.
datakoe
Area Manager
Area Manager
 
Posts: 97
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2014 10:30 am
Location: Moscow, Russia
Has thanked: 27 times
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: New Page - Tunnels

Postby kennedia » Tue Jul 15, 2014 5:43 am

Is there any reason this page cannot be published in the wiki? Of course it can always be adapted over time.
kennedia
Area Manager
Area Manager
 
Posts: 43
Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 9:25 pm
Has thanked: 20 times
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: New Page - Tunnels

Postby harling » Tue Feb 25, 2014 4:42 am

kentsmith9 wrote:
harling wrote:Please forgive my late re-entry into this discussion.
The main thing that distinguishes tunnels...

Lots of good thoughts in there, but I am not sure I saw a suggestion to change in our current page. :mrgreen:

Frankly, the time of championing my own ideas regarding Waze (e.g., reviving the Best Practices page) ended a couple years ago. I have plenty of ideas, and read many good ideas from other people, but in my experience all the talk in the world has resulted in very little actual implementation. If anything I post is noteworthy today, I'll leave it to someone else to include it wherever it belongs, and not bother writing functional specs and such until I'm on the payroll.
harling
 
Posts: 1736
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 8:42 pm
Location: Eastern MA
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 123 times

Re: New Page - Tunnels

Postby kentsmith9 » Mon Feb 24, 2014 11:54 pm

harling wrote:Please forgive my late re-entry into this discussion.
The main thing that distinguishes tunnels...

Lots of good thoughts in there, but I am not sure I saw a suggestion to change in our current page. :mrgreen:
kentsmith9
Waze Global Champs
Waze Global Champs
 
Posts: 5277
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:33 pm
Location: SF/SJ Bay Area of Northern California
Has thanked: 1380 times
Been thanked: 1595 times

Re: New Page - Tunnels

Postby harling » Mon Feb 24, 2014 10:12 pm

Please forgive my late re-entry into this discussion.

The main thing that distinguishes tunnels from other segments is the lack of GPS data--and the problem we are trying to solve is not how to detect tunnels or designate them on a map, but how to route through them when faced with that lack of GPS data. (In fact, if equipment were installed in certain tunnels that provided both accurate GPS information and data service, they wouldn't require any special handling at all.) A guideline of applying a negative elevation to a tunnel segment is harmless--as long as the routing engine doesn't start making assumptions based on it.

As I have mentioned ad nauseum, there are sections of the Central Artery in Boston where underground ramps crossing both above and below the main tunnels, all directly below both street-level and elevated roads. It's a perilous area to edit, and any one-size-fits-all rule about relative elevation is almost guaranteed to fail at some point. [I am not aware of any place where we have run out of negative elevations and need to assign a non-negative elevation to an underground segment, but it could happen. I am certain that we have had to use a -5 in more than one location.]

As for the more important problem of navigation, I'm still convinced that the only manageable way to navigate a network of branching tunnels (in which GPS and/or network connectivity are unavailable) is to treat the entire "dark" graph of segments as a black box with M inputs and N outputs, and each of the (MxN) combinations has its own total length and transit time. The segments are visible to the driver, editors and routing engine for the sake of calculating distance, displaying the map, generating turn instructions and (maybe) generating the "black box" data structure itself, but any attempt to treat each internal segment between points A and B independently, as is done above-ground, will be a combinatorial nightmare.
harling
 
Posts: 1736
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 8:42 pm
Location: Eastern MA
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 123 times

Next

Return to Wiki Updates and Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users