Perhaps a point place would be more appropriate for these, given that areas have no special properties, and won't be visible on the map (except for maybe the label)?DwarfLord wrote:In recent months I've encountered some compliant public parking lots located underneath freeway viaducts. These are a pain to map in separate chunks to avoid overlapping the freeway, and not accurate to do so either. Is it time to remove the prohibition against mapping Parking-Lot Area Places over roads bearing through traffic?
Timbones(6) • UK Coordinator • Forum Moderator • Closure Monitor
Scripts: WME Colour Highlights • WME Route Tester • WME Geometries
Scripts: WME Colour Highlights • WME Route Tester • WME Geometries
This is already accepted as best practice, and had been adopted in the guidelines of many countries.DwarfLord wrote:It suggests to me that, if we don't want drivers to be confused, we mustn't use the Parking Lot type to mark anything that isn't general-purpose parking for the general public.
If the radius is too large, then we should ask Waze to reduce it. I'd also like to suggest that the Ps to not appear if the destination is known to have parking, i.e. place has 'Parking for customers' ticked or nav point is on parking lot road.
Timbones(6) • UK Coordinator • Forum Moderator • Closure Monitor
Scripts: WME Colour Highlights • WME Route Tester • WME Geometries
Scripts: WME Colour Highlights • WME Route Tester • WME Geometries
Re: [Updated Page Proposal] The Parking-Lot Place Area