Condition of Logan Rd, Underwood
Hi all,
Not sure how to handle this one so figured I'd put up a forum post.
I was looking at this UR and noticed a few things.
It looks to me that Logan Rd in the area around the UR has been un-split. Not a problem in itself, I just (think I) remember it being split before. I also couldn't find the thread where the un-split was discussed (if there is one), if someone could point me in the right direction (maybe this post belongs there?). I did find this thread if it's related (although it's quite old)? If it was un-split, that would probably explain the below issues.
I also think these segments should be locked higher than level 1: even though this stretch of Logan Rd is no longer a state route, it is still a major arterial. TBH I think they should be at least level 3?
Not sure how to handle this one so figured I'd put up a forum post.
I was looking at this UR and noticed a few things.
It looks to me that Logan Rd in the area around the UR has been un-split. Not a problem in itself, I just (think I) remember it being split before. I also couldn't find the thread where the un-split was discussed (if there is one), if someone could point me in the right direction (maybe this post belongs there?). I did find this thread if it's related (although it's quite old)? If it was un-split, that would probably explain the below issues.
- https://www.waze.com/en-GB/editor/?env= ... =324100269
- https://www.waze.com/en-GB/editor/?env= ... =327916778
- https://www.waze.com/en-GB/editor/?env= ... =324100267
- https://www.waze.com/en-GB/editor/?env= ... =327916778
I also think these segments should be locked higher than level 1: even though this stretch of Logan Rd is no longer a state route, it is still a major arterial. TBH I think they should be at least level 3?
Re: Condition of Logan Rd, Underwood