Proposed update to the wiki - UK Quickstart page

Image

Moderators: Unholy, Timbones

Re: Proposed update to the wiki - UK Quickstart page

Postby woodvale » Tue Jan 01, 2013 11:06 pm

I've copied the new material and changes to the live wiki page now. It was done in two edits - the first one inserting the Precautions section and the bullet in Creating New Roads about cul-de-sacs; the second edit was to replace the guidance to the global Unlock Request forum with one to the UK Unlock Request forum.

Can anyone tell me how to delete the draft page I created? I don't want to leave it there as an orphan :cry:
John
woodvale UK Champ, UK CM, AM City and South London, Jamaica WI
Latest Waze on Galaxy S7 Android 7.0
Waze FAQ UK Wazeopedia UK Forum
ImageImageImage
woodvale
Area Manager
Area Manager
 
Posts: 2752
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2012 10:54 am
Location: Croydon, UK
Has thanked: 572 times
Been thanked: 866 times

Re: Proposed update to the wiki - UK Quickstart page

Postby woodvale » Mon Dec 31, 2012 10:21 pm

seriousarsonist wrote:Probably a moot point, but, in the bit that EVERY editor SHOULD know the every segment is connected by 1 or 2 nodes bit might need a little * for reminding people that every segment should have 2 nodes even if it doesn't have 2 junctions. While this is great for getting loads of points quickly in an area it would be nice if people terminated sections when they add them.

I've added an extra bullet to the Creating New Roads section to remind people to make sure they terminate a cul-de-sac with a node, not a loop or roundabout. Hope that addresses your point.
John
woodvale UK Champ, UK CM, AM City and South London, Jamaica WI
Latest Waze on Galaxy S7 Android 7.0
Waze FAQ UK Wazeopedia UK Forum
ImageImageImage
woodvale
Area Manager
Area Manager
 
Posts: 2752
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2012 10:54 am
Location: Croydon, UK
Has thanked: 572 times
Been thanked: 866 times

Re: Proposed update to the wiki - UK Quickstart page

Postby woodvale » Sat Dec 29, 2012 4:39 pm

UK_Quickstart draft version 2.

Had another look at this and reduced the length of the precautions section. I hope it reads better now.

Thoughts?
John
woodvale UK Champ, UK CM, AM City and South London, Jamaica WI
Latest Waze on Galaxy S7 Android 7.0
Waze FAQ UK Wazeopedia UK Forum
ImageImageImage
woodvale
Area Manager
Area Manager
 
Posts: 2752
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2012 10:54 am
Location: Croydon, UK
Has thanked: 572 times
Been thanked: 866 times

Proposed update to the wiki - UK Quickstart page

Postby woodvale » Wed Dec 26, 2012 11:31 pm

OK (and I agree) but which bit to delete? Unless you can reword and combine some of the points.....?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
John
woodvale UK Champ, UK CM, AM City and South London, Jamaica WI
Latest Waze on Galaxy S7 Android 7.0
Waze FAQ UK Wazeopedia UK Forum
ImageImageImage
woodvale
Area Manager
Area Manager
 
Posts: 2752
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2012 10:54 am
Location: Croydon, UK
Has thanked: 572 times
Been thanked: 866 times

Re: Proposed update to the wiki - How to label cities page

Postby woodvale » Wed Dec 26, 2012 1:57 pm

As per Iain's suggestion, I've created a new page with my proposed update to the UK Quickstart page. When we're happy that it meets the need, I'll copy the text into the UK Quickstart page and delete this one.

Please review and comment.

Thanks
John
woodvale UK Champ, UK CM, AM City and South London, Jamaica WI
Latest Waze on Galaxy S7 Android 7.0
Waze FAQ UK Wazeopedia UK Forum
ImageImageImage
woodvale
Area Manager
Area Manager
 
Posts: 2752
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2012 10:54 am
Location: Croydon, UK
Has thanked: 572 times
Been thanked: 866 times

Re: Proposed update to the wiki - How to label cities page

Postby woodvale » Mon Dec 24, 2012 9:56 pm

Done.

I can't see a way of making it a draft page which could then be reviewed by the CMs before publication, so it's there, warts and all. If there is a way of producing a draft which I can make available for review, please let me know.

I'd be grateful for feedback, as I'd like to suggest some changes to the UK Quickstart - Basics that every editor should know section to try and make it clear to new editors that they're generally not starting on a map that's never been touched. Where they are, naming roads and so on, fine, but when they're proposing to make changes in city suburbs because they know their area well, so do others, and they need to make use of the forum and PMs to communicate with the previous editors and discuss their proposed changes.

There have been two instances recently where I've had to PM new editors about some of the changes they've made. I've tried to be polite and non-critical, but they've changed the map and undone things that I and others have done for good reasons, so their changes have had to be undone. The new editors both took exception to this, considered it overly-critical and bullying by more experienced editors, and have apparently taken their keyboards and left. This was not a result I expected or intended, and if we've lost two editors who could have been very useful, I'm sorry for that. If the wiki can push communication between editors, perhaps we can avoid such conflicts again.
John
woodvale UK Champ, UK CM, AM City and South London, Jamaica WI
Latest Waze on Galaxy S7 Android 7.0
Waze FAQ UK Wazeopedia UK Forum
ImageImageImage
woodvale
Area Manager
Area Manager
 
Posts: 2752
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2012 10:54 am
Location: Croydon, UK
Has thanked: 572 times
Been thanked: 866 times

Re: Proposed update to the wiki - How to label cities page

Postby woodvale » Sun Dec 23, 2012 11:54 pm

If people aren't expressing their opposition to my updating the wiki, I'll do so over the next couple of days. It'll give me an excuse to get away from the family for a few hours :D
John
woodvale UK Champ, UK CM, AM City and South London, Jamaica WI
Latest Waze on Galaxy S7 Android 7.0
Waze FAQ UK Wazeopedia UK Forum
ImageImageImage
woodvale
Area Manager
Area Manager
 
Posts: 2752
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2012 10:54 am
Location: Croydon, UK
Has thanked: 572 times
Been thanked: 866 times

Proposed update to the wiki - How to label cities page

Postby woodvale » Thu Dec 13, 2012 7:42 am

LB = London Borough. That section of the wiki highlighted that the issue was common around London where postal addresses use the counties of Middlesex, Essex, Kent and so on. I presume there are similar examples around Birmingham, Manchester and other conurbations where new local authority boundaries were drawn without postal addresses changing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
John
woodvale UK Champ, UK CM, AM City and South London, Jamaica WI
Latest Waze on Galaxy S7 Android 7.0
Waze FAQ UK Wazeopedia UK Forum
ImageImageImage
woodvale
Area Manager
Area Manager
 
Posts: 2752
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2012 10:54 am
Location: Croydon, UK
Has thanked: 572 times
Been thanked: 866 times

Proposed update to the wiki - UK Quickstart page

Postby woodvale » Wed Dec 12, 2012 9:28 pm

Edited: name changed to reflect subject now about UK Quickstart page

The How to Label Cities section on Postal vs Actual Addresses lists, as an example, Bromley (Kent) which is in the LB Bromley. However, as that Bromley is the largest town of that name in the UK, the rules dictate that it should drop the (County) suffix and, on the map, we show it as "Bromley".

Ditto Enfield, which the wiki refers to as Enfield (Middx), but which is only seen on the map as "Enfield", although there is a set of streets with the city set to Enfield (Middlesex) just north-west of Gordon Hill on the map, and as an alt name on Myddleton Ave in Forty Hill.

The other example given in the wiki is Hornchurch, and Hornchurch and South Hornchurch, both in Essex, are the only Hornchurches in the UK, so don't need a suffix, meaning we have a slightly misleading set of examples.

We do have a couple of good examples - Belmont in LB Harrow, and Belmont in LB Sutton. The Sutton version is correctly shown on the map as Belmont (Surrey). The Barnet version is shown as Belmont (London) where it should be Belmont (Middx) according to the Gazetteer. There are quite a few other Belmonts around the country, and I have no idea which could claim to be the largest.

As Belmont is a good example of the Postal vs Actual Addresses scenario, can I suggest that we drop the use of Bromley, Enfield and Hornchurch, and amend the wiki to use the Belmont examples.

What do people think?
Last edited by woodvale on Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:00 pm, edited 3 times in total.
John
woodvale UK Champ, UK CM, AM City and South London, Jamaica WI
Latest Waze on Galaxy S7 Android 7.0
Waze FAQ UK Wazeopedia UK Forum
ImageImageImage
woodvale
Area Manager
Area Manager
 
Posts: 2752
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2012 10:54 am
Location: Croydon, UK
Has thanked: 572 times
Been thanked: 866 times

Re: Proposed update to the wiki - How to label cities page

Postby Timbones » Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:49 pm

woodvale is right - we do need better examples on that page that use "cities with counties".
Timbones(6) • UK Coordinator • Forum Moderator • Global Wiki Moderator • Routing Expert
Extensions: WME Colour HighlightsWME Route TesterWME Geometries
Timbones
Coordinators
Coordinators
 
Posts: 6809
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2011 10:33 am
Location: York, UK
Has thanked: 990 times
Been thanked: 2734 times

Next

Return to United Kingdom

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Property_Guru