I tend to agree with daknife...
If we had a "southwest locking guidance" I would generally think it would be to err on locking to a lower level rather than higher because of a lower population density and less maturity in editing of some roads.
I also ask the question, "Why would we need a southwest locking guidance?" Irowiki, why do you think we need one? I can think of non-technical answers that focus more on the social aspects of Waze... for instance, that it would be harder to do this country-wide, so let's just work to advance our region.
Technically I think that the two issues I mentioned above are more critical than regionalism of locking... that is population density and roadway maturity.
If we had a "southwest locking guidance" I would generally think it would be to err on locking to a lower level rather than higher because of a lower population density and less maturity in editing of some roads.
I also ask the question, "Why would we need a southwest locking guidance?" Irowiki, why do you think we need one? I can think of non-technical answers that focus more on the social aspects of Waze... for instance, that it would be harder to do this country-wide, so let's just work to advance our region.
Technically I think that the two issues I mentioned above are more critical than regionalism of locking... that is population density and roadway maturity.
Re: Southwest lock standard?