Coordinator: bretmcvey & ARC: ehepner1977 | SunnyRaynbows
------------------------------------------------------------

Post Reply

PLN Region Standards - PP / PLA

Post by SunnyRaynbows
Hi,
Recent discussions involving this subject have come up and we'd like to open this for input and comment. Presently most of the region is L2 for PP, L3 for PLA. One area is L3 for PP and PLA. The consideration is creating a regional standard with a leaning toward L3 for PP and PLA. What say you?
SunnyRaynbows
Coordinators
Coordinators
Posts: 133
Has thanked: 77 times
Been thanked: 96 times

POSTER_ID:17382780

1

Send a message
SunnyRaynbows
Partner Coordinator
Assistant Regional Coordinator - Plains

Post by utechtl
Thoughts as a recent Rank 2 promotee, I feel like putting another thing at L3 would alienate the new guys. If you're in a bigger area a lot of the stuff is already up to date and gives us the thought of "oh god, i'm going to be here a while before I can do anything" or i'm going to have to harass @tinfoil to unlock/approve my edits.
utechtl
Map Raider
Map Raider
Posts: 2
Been thanked: 5 times
Send a message

Post by tinfoilhattie
herrchin wrote:I am in favor of L3 for both PP and PLA for the following reasons:
  1. It is not terribly hard to obtain L2, and can often be done before anyone in the state community is even aware this new editor exists. They can also obtain their automatic rank 2 promotion through mostly repetitive edits which limits their hands-on experience with all aspects of editing (they may not be well-rounded at all). Example: I had an editor add 1400 Walking Trail segments over 2 days.
  2. Thus this L2 editor may not be connected with the community, nor aware of Place best practices. They could not be aware of the existence of the state WoP page even. Bad category selection is a notorious early error (Coffee Shop for any place that serves coffee).
  3. Newer editors are generally not aware of place harmonization. They may un-do a harmonization in favor of something like a localized URL.
  4. PURs feature prominently in the editor, begging for attention. An L2 can approve a bad PUR.
  5. A completed Place rarely needs further updates.
  6. If a "complete" Place needs a legitimate update, the L2 can still suggest it, and their PUR can be approved by L3+. This isn't a stealth item likely to be lost either; PURs are prominent per an earlier bullet.
+100 to the above and ditto to L3 for both.

PP & PLA are both reasonably nuanced, and getting the data right takes some practice and, more often than not, help and intervention from more experienced editors.

I'd rather review 100 L2 requests to a place than have 100 approved places broken without warning (never mind 1000).
tinfoilhattie
Posts: 31
Has thanked: 27 times
Been thanked: 26 times
Send a message
Has anyone checked on the llamas lately?

MN State Manager
Milwaukee Area Manager
Seattle Area Manager / NWR Collab Editor

https://j.mp/1CRiS79https://s.waze.tools/beta.pnghttps://s.waze.tools/c4.png

Post by TheChrisK
I'm in favor for L3 on PP and PLA and would concur with herrchin's reasons for doing so.
TheChrisK
Country Manager
Country Manager
Posts: 720
Has thanked: 286 times
Been thanked: 303 times
Send a message
TheChrisK

Country Manager: United States

Post by tango259
megg2004 wrote:I can't disagree with the 6 points, however, as a current L2, I'm quite torn on this topic. tldr: leave PP at 2

I can only speak for myself, but I feel I'm a fairly involved L2 (asking questions, formal mentoring), so by having access to PP right now, I feel I'm learning a lot and contributing quite a bit to the map. I feel very comfortable asking questions, so I don't proceed with something I'm unsure of (not sure if I'm the exception to the norm on this?). Creating/updating PP is actually my favorite thing to do, so I would be quite sad to see that ability be dampened by moving the lock to 3 (updating multiple items on a single PP that is locked above your level can be a little frustrating and much more tedious).

I consider myself a 2.5 level editor. I've got a really good handle on the basics but don't quite feel comfortable having the L3 privileges. I can sympathize that many editors at my rank may not do what I do (ask questions, have a formal mentor) and are creating issues within the map, particularly when it comes to PP. However, having the PP standard raised would negatively affect me. As a lower-ranking editor, it sometimes feels like there is nothing to do, having PP locked at 3 would only lengthen that amount of time of feeling like there is nothing to do. My official answer is: leave it at 2 for no other reason that I feel like I'm an L2 that is pretty proficient at handling PP (because I've reached out and asked for help).

I see exactly where you are coming from. I am torn too because I know the feeling of not being able to do much since everything is locked. But over the years I've seen first hand how detrimental an inexperienced editor can be. You are an editor that joined the editing community wholeheartedly and you are proactively staking steps to learn and gain experience. Unfortunately not many get into editing like we do. Some people just hop on every once in a while to make a quick edit without even knowing that there are standards

Increasing the lock level doesn't prevent lower ranked editors from working on new PURs. It simply requires an R3+ to approve the edits before they go lice in the map.

I stand by my opinion to increase standard to 3, however I completely agree with your points that we are slowly but surely locking lower ranks out of doing most things. Maybe this just requires working with Staff to implement the community more in the starting steps for new editors instead of them finding it 1k edits in.
tango259
Posts: 62
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 32 times
Send a message
https://storage.googleapis.com/wazeoped ... anager.pnghttps://s.waze.tools/c5s.pnghttps://s.waze.tools/s0300.pnghttps://s.waze.tools/beta.png

Tango259
Minnesota State Manager
Large Area Manager: Southeast Wisconsin
Other AMs in: Wisconsin, Alaska
Beta Leader, PLN Collab Liaison, Map Raid Mentor, Formal Mentor

Post by tango259
As others have mentioned, GLR has had this standard in place for a while now and it's worked great. I have personally come across new editors just by verifying their PURs. I fully support the increase to L3, but I think it should be made clear that we need to pay attention to who is submitting them. 15+ PURs by the same editor that's not in the state's contact list throws a red flag for me that maybe they aren't aware of our communication methods (or that state and regional "chat groups" even exist for that matter).

On a side note, GLR also locks RPPs at 3 as well. I'd like to see a similar standard in PLN for a similar reason as mentioned above. If an inexperienced editor just approves PURs without even seeing the WoP page, we end up with pictures of legs or people instead of the house (or business for PP). This is probably another discussion though, up to you guys if you want to include them in this one.
tango259
Posts: 62
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 32 times
Send a message
https://storage.googleapis.com/wazeoped ... anager.pnghttps://s.waze.tools/c5s.pnghttps://s.waze.tools/s0300.pnghttps://s.waze.tools/beta.png

Tango259
Minnesota State Manager
Large Area Manager: Southeast Wisconsin
Other AMs in: Wisconsin, Alaska
Beta Leader, PLN Collab Liaison, Map Raid Mentor, Formal Mentor

Post by Sdtahoe
I would be in agreement with a L3 lock. Jr editors can still update with a Sr editor approving a PUR. With the latest imports I feel it would help get new places complete not just approved. My view may be slightly screwed as SD is not overrun with PURs as other areas can be.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Sdtahoe
State Manager
State Manager
Posts: 70
Has thanked: 27 times
Been thanked: 8 times
Send a message

Post by RaptorGuyInNC
I concur with L3
RaptorGuyInNC
State Manager
State Manager
Posts: 7
Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 3 times
Send a message
ND SM, Northeast MN AM, Eastern NC AM