Naming Michigan lefts

Moderators: SkiDooGuy, roadtechie, GizmoGuy411

MUTI standards revisited

Postby buzzardjoe » Thu Aug 27, 2015 2:12 pm

I want to revisit the Michigan Median U-Turn Intersection standard to propose a few revisions:
1. Eliminate the requirement for "proper signage"
2. Change the requirement for a 45-90 degree angle at the lead-in first junction to be <45 degrees.
3. Add a Lock Standard section

1. Eliminate the requirement for "proper signage"
* For a variety of reasons, there is not good consistency for when MUTI signage has been physically signed. The Woodward/7 Mile junction has no MUTI signage for any direction. If I were driving here, I would be reassured if Waze gave me the same full TTS instructions (to Woodward Ave N / to 7 Mile Rd E) here as at most other MUTIs.

* For the other turn-arounds (that don't service 2 different roads) that are generally unsigned, we currently configure with No Name. Going north on Woodward and needing to route to a sidestreet on the west side of Woodward, gives "Turn left on Woodward Ave south" two times -- the first time due to name inheritance. Waze announcing the name of the u-turn lane as "Woodward Ave south" is wrong because the people do not consider the "left-turn lane" leading up to and through the u-turn segment to be named for the cardinal direction going the other way. A properly configured MUTI works much better: "Turn left to Woodward Ave south" to move into the left turn lane, and then "Turn left on Woodward Ave south" to actually transition off the MUTI.

2. Change the requirement for a 45-90 degree angle at the lead-in first junction to be <45 degrees.
The currently written standard says "The initial junction ideally should be as close to the start of the solid white line as possible." This prompts the Wazer to move into the correct left turn lane as soon as possible and avoid missing it due to traffic backups. Waze announcing the direction change as a TL is wrong. You KL into a left turn lane, and then TL from the MUTI back onto the main road.

3. Add a Lock Standard section
A MUTI, or turn-around lane, is part of the road it is connected to They should all be locked at the same level.
[ img ] [ img ]
Area Manager: Rochester Hills Area, Michigan; Boston, Massachusetts
buzzardjoe
 
Posts: 140
Joined: Thu May 09, 2013 1:44 am
Location: Eastern Oakland County, MI
Has thanked: 48 times
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: Naming Michigan lefts

Postby buzzardjoe » Thu Aug 27, 2015 5:16 pm

Since MUTIs are to the left of BC, we don't currently get "exit" for angles <45, we get KL.
[ img ] [ img ]
Area Manager: Rochester Hills Area, Michigan; Boston, Massachusetts
buzzardjoe
 
Posts: 140
Joined: Thu May 09, 2013 1:44 am
Location: Eastern Oakland County, MI
Has thanked: 48 times
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: Naming Michigan lefts

Postby bz2012 » Sat Mar 01, 2014 2:45 pm

If you have not seen this, you might be interested.
http://www.katc.com/news/j-turns-changing-how-drivers-navigate-us-90/#_
State Manager, Louisiana
bz2012
Map Raider
Map Raider
 
Posts: 1596
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 4:32 pm
Location: Baton Rouge, La
Has thanked: 1983 times
Been thanked: 311 times

Re: Naming Michigan lefts

Postby davielde » Fri Dec 06, 2013 10:13 pm

After some initial positive feedback on the Michigan left from Jackson Rd E to Zeeb Rd N, I was asked to extend them to a few other areas around Ann Arbor that I can drive regularly. In each case, I've left a temporary "Other" landmark locked at 3 explaining what is going on and with a link to this forum topic. In each case, the angles are set for the "turn left onto the Mich Left / turn left on the main road / turn right onto the crossing road" TTS instruction.

Eisenhower Pkwy and Main
Jackson and Wagner
Jackson and Zeeb
Jackson and Baker
Huron Pkwy and Glazier Way

All of these are "standard" Michigan Lefts, but two also offer a continuation straight onto other streets in addition to the left turn. The main one is Jackson & Zeeb into the Meijer parking lot. Typically, these continuations are unlabeled and only the main cross street is mentioned. The Meijer intersection is something of an exception in that it has a small sign though showing arrows, but it has no text for the "straight" option. For now, these dual-purpose connectors are just labeled as standard Michigan lefts. Depending on signage or the importance of the straight option, how these are labeled could be an element for discussion. I can test any suggestions out at that intersection going forward.

Here's the signage at Jackson Rd W to Zeeb S. It shows the left "only" arrow and the left/straight arrow for the right lane. The same sign appears above the traffic light.
[ img ]
[ img ]
CM: USA
SM: Michigan, Vermont
AM: Ann Arbor, MI & Thunder Bay, ON
WME Michigan
davielde
 
Posts: 1219
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:01 pm
Location: Michigan, USA
Has thanked: 461 times
Been thanked: 759 times

Re: Naming Michigan lefts

Postby davielde » Fri Dec 06, 2013 10:53 pm

jemay wrote:Observation... The landmarks, why don't you use "Junction" (if you name it, it will appear on the client if is big enough.)

Because my RC said so ;) As sketch points out, they're only for temporary editor reference and not meant to display elsewhere.
[ img ]
CM: USA
SM: Michigan, Vermont
AM: Ann Arbor, MI & Thunder Bay, ON
WME Michigan
davielde
 
Posts: 1219
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:01 pm
Location: Michigan, USA
Has thanked: 461 times
Been thanked: 759 times

Re: Naming Michigan lefts

Postby davielde » Sat Dec 07, 2013 1:28 am

sketch wrote:For the shared left situations, I've typically been using one segment for each purpose, like here: https://www.waze.com/editor/?lon=-82.90 ... TT&env=usa

It eliminates the confusion of someone seemingly being told to turn onto the other side of the road when they're actually going to a mall parking lot or some other street.

It could be accomplished with two stacked segments using the same nodes and tailored turn restrictions, which may look better on the map, but this is easier for other editors to see and understand. I haven't looked at this in the client to verify.


I swear that I saw a discussion somewhere about a potential future feature that would allow us to designate the number of lanes on a segment. I just spent ten minutes trying to find it on the forums, but was I just dreaming? If not and the champs are aware of it or its in beta, are # of lanes still under consideration, and would each lane have different turn restrictions?

BTW, the stacked segment only works if you enable the turn onto the ramp :) It's just outside my editing area, and since you're likely to see it as part of this discussion, would you mind fixing it? If not, I can post to the Unlock and Update Request forum.
[ img ]
CM: USA
SM: Michigan, Vermont
AM: Ann Arbor, MI & Thunder Bay, ON
WME Michigan
davielde
 
Posts: 1219
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:01 pm
Location: Michigan, USA
Has thanked: 461 times
Been thanked: 759 times

Re: Naming Michigan lefts

Postby davielde » Sun Dec 08, 2013 1:31 am

At present, here are the main references to jughandles. There is just a brief mention the NJ wiki, but a lot of the champs have weighed in on a few different forum topics.
    Wiki: New Jersey - under "Ramps" - "For this reason, at-grade jug handle ramps on the state's major highways that have exit-style signage should also be ramps. Other at-grade connectors that do not have exit style signage should follow the general rules for at-grade connectors."
    Forum: Jughandles - probably the most valuable discussion

There seems to be a lot of consensus for using ramps for jughandles at at-grade connections. The NJ wiki reference to "exit style signage" would not be appropriate for most Michigan Lefts though. In practice, however, it looks like they are fairly loose with that standard.

To look at a few ML signage examples, I would hardly consider these "exit style", but at least they're green signs, and they exemplify what you would get at major cross streets. Sketch has a lot of really good ones in the first post on this topic, and some appear in other replies as well. If you're really lucky, you get something like this:
[ img ]
When a road is maintained locally instead of by MDOT though, you may get this at best:
[ img ][ img ]

This has been mentioned elsewhere, but just to mention it again, a ML is distinct from a simple turnaround or u-turn in that it occurs at a junction with a cross street that would be classified as primary or higher and typically has some form of signage for the other street. The turnarounds, however, usually have a similar dedicated left turn lane but may or may not have simple signs such as "left lane must turn left"--even when there is an option to continue straight onto another street as well as turn left. We would treat these as standard at-grade connectors and not use ramps, typically have no street name, and maintain both angles >45º to get the double "turn left" instruction rather than "keep left". From an editing standpoint, they would pretty much be the same thing as a ML except for the road type and naming convention.
[ img ]
[ img ]
CM: USA
SM: Michigan, Vermont
AM: Ann Arbor, MI & Thunder Bay, ON
WME Michigan
davielde
 
Posts: 1219
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:01 pm
Location: Michigan, USA
Has thanked: 461 times
Been thanked: 759 times

Re: Naming Michigan lefts

Postby davielde » Sun Dec 08, 2013 3:02 am

sketch wrote:Regarding the double segments sharing an origin node, yes, I think that's a good idea. I'd prefer not to have them share an end node, though, for editor visibility and because of the documented problems with segments that share both nodes.


I agree that with double segments, sharing the origin would be ideal. It more accurately reflects the logical aspects of the road in that whether you end up with the u-turn or going straight onto a different road, your route shares the same departure point. In order to test this out in practice, I updated one turn near Jackson and Wagner to the single origin/separate end node suggestion. The existing Michigan Left ramp segment no longer ends at the node shared by Jackson Plz, which is now served by a new continuation segment matching the road type of Jackson Plz (I'm curious to see if TTS gets plaza right too...). The new segment only allows the continuation and has the left turn disabled since that function is served by the separate Michigan Left. I'll try to field test it on Monday to see how it works out.

Just out of curiosity, what are the documented problems with two segments sharing nodes? I can imagine routing problems where the one with faster average speed or shorter distance may be preferred, which could particularly mess with drivers if both have separate street names, etc. I haven't seen this anywhere on the map yet where it was intentional. Any other issues?
[ img ]
CM: USA
SM: Michigan, Vermont
AM: Ann Arbor, MI & Thunder Bay, ON
WME Michigan
davielde
 
Posts: 1219
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:01 pm
Location: Michigan, USA
Has thanked: 461 times
Been thanked: 759 times

Re: Naming Michigan lefts

Postby davielde » Sun Dec 08, 2013 3:09 am

sketch wrote:In Michigan, however, I've never seen one of these signed as "U TURN" or anything like it, so I suppose I'd continue to leave them unnamed. I don't really know what you guys would call them up there, although I've seen a few around named "Turn Around".


Agreed. I would leave them unnamed as we don't really call them anything. Even "turn around" is a colloquial rather than official use that may vary depending on where in the state you were raised. Directions might sound like "Pull out onto Jackson and turn around to go the other way on Jackson and head straight into downtown".

EDIT: According to MDOT, it would be a "U-turn at median crossover". It is never signed as such.
Last edited by davielde on Sun Dec 08, 2013 2:19 pm, edited 2 times in total.
[ img ]
CM: USA
SM: Michigan, Vermont
AM: Ann Arbor, MI & Thunder Bay, ON
WME Michigan
davielde
 
Posts: 1219
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:01 pm
Location: Michigan, USA
Has thanked: 461 times
Been thanked: 759 times

Re: Naming Michigan lefts

Postby davielde » Tue Dec 10, 2013 2:39 pm

sketch wrote:To use the example posted by davielde:
A user needing to turn around will be told first "Turn left, at Jackson Rd E, to Wagner Rd S.", and then "Turn left, at Jackson Rd." A user needing to turn left onto Jackson Plz, on the other hand, will be told "Turn left, at Jackson Plz."


After driving these segments, once for the Michigan left, and the other for the continuation onto Jackson Plaza, those are the exact audio prompts for that setup.
[ img ]
CM: USA
SM: Michigan, Vermont
AM: Ann Arbor, MI & Thunder Bay, ON
WME Michigan
davielde
 
Posts: 1219
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:01 pm
Location: Michigan, USA
Has thanked: 461 times
Been thanked: 759 times

Next

Return to Michigan

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users