Landmark Wiki for MI

Moderators: delilush, SkiDooGuy, TerryPurdue, GizmoGuy411

Re: Landmark Wiki for MI

Postby mapcat » Fri Aug 30, 2013 1:01 pm

robc007 wrote:I have to say, in my experience so far, the park and ride lots don't seem to do anything useful on the map.

Eventually some (maybe all?) landmarks will be searchable, so it would be helpful to include park & ride lots to assist with the app's primary goal of assisting commuters.
CM, USA/Canada ∙ iPhone 5 ∙ iOS 7.1
mapcat
 
Posts: 2444
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 5:29 am
Has thanked: 95 times
Been thanked: 196 times

Re: Landmark Wiki for MI

Postby lelehman » Wed Jan 15, 2014 5:56 am

I'm also down for keeping (and eventually possibly adding) lakes. I was driving near Greenville the other day, and someone has taken quite a lot of time to add in most of the lakes around there.

I tried to fight it, but it was regrettably enjoyable.
ImageImageImage
Rank 5
Mid-Michigan/Tri-Cities Area Manager, Metro Detroit UR Housekeeper
Ithaca, Michigan
Michigan subforum, Michigan wiki
lelehman
Area Manager
Area Manager
 
Posts: 41
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2013 7:25 pm
Location: Ithaca, MI
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 20 times

Re: Landmark Wiki for MI

Postby keeegs » Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:17 am

Seems like a good idea to me.

I think we also need to decide on the use of Parking Lots for. IMO if they're a public pay lot they should be landmarked.
Image
West Michigan Area Manager
Moto X 4.4.4 - Vzw
keeegs
Area Manager
Area Manager
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 11:13 pm
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: Landmark Wiki for MI

Postby jdeyoung » Wed Jan 15, 2014 2:06 pm

First, there is coverage of mapping water landmarks here:
https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=47438&p=429312&hilit=mapping+water#p426017
I admire the time people take to map lakes to the shoreline, but that actual process is inconsequential, since most lakes of any size are already displayed on the client - albeit without a name. If people are really interested in seeing a name for a lake - a simple (large enough) rectangle with the name may actually suffice. As I understood from the thread cited, there ARE names in the water layer, they're just not now currently displayed.
Image
AM Chicago, NW Indiana, SW Lower MI
jdeyoung
 
Posts: 466
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 10:04 pm
Location: Greater Chicago Metro area, NW Indiana, SW Lower MI, USA
Has thanked: 29 times
Been thanked: 201 times

Re: Landmark Wiki for MI

Postby davielde » Fri Mar 28, 2014 1:25 am

In case there is a very small chance that newer editors see this thread prior to learning about "Places", all guidance is available on the wiki here at the national level. Due to the benefits of standardizing nationally as well as the numerous new categories, I believe that any separate discussion at the state level is moot at this point.
Image
CM: USA
SM: Michigan, Vermont
AM: Ann Arbor, MI & Thunder Bay, ON
WME Michigan
davielde
 
Posts: 1219
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:01 pm
Location: Michigan, USA
Has thanked: 461 times
Been thanked: 759 times

Re: Landmark Wiki for MI

Postby davielde » Wed Jan 15, 2014 5:41 am

Boiler_81 wrote:In many areas of MI lakes provide a point of reference. Without the names, the value is much diminished.

I also think that it is beneficial to have lakes labeled with the name. It's not a priority right now for me to add lakes, but if they make this DNR list, it's probably worth adding them in the future for the label, or keeping them if they already exist.

As for the mud holes and mill ponds, I always try to appreciate the time and effort that some editor has put in making sure that every geo node matches up exactly with the shoreline during the half second that it takes to delete it. In that regard, some bodies of water are works of art.
Image
CM: USA
SM: Michigan, Vermont
AM: Ann Arbor, MI & Thunder Bay, ON
WME Michigan
davielde
 
Posts: 1219
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:01 pm
Location: Michigan, USA
Has thanked: 461 times
Been thanked: 759 times

Re: Landmark Wiki for MI

Postby Boiler_81 » Tue Dec 31, 2013 2:27 am

I also have issue with the much of the water. In many areas of MI lakes provide a point of reference. Without the names, the value is much diminished. I have run across some areas where every mud hole is mapped. I have eliminated the mud holes and left the larger named bodies of water. I think I am going to continue with this method. I am not going to add any water nor am I going to complain if someone deletes it.

I really don't have issue with the national guidelines on religious sites. I think I may delete them as I come across them.
Boiler_81
 
Posts: 69
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 6:27 pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 20 times

Re: Landmark Wiki for MI

Postby Boiler_81 » Mon Dec 30, 2013 9:29 pm

The national proposal (based on the Connecticut guidelines) for landmarks is no being followed in MI https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=129&t=38934 I have been deleting landmarks which do not meet the guideline with the exception of bodies of water and Religious Sites (most don't meet the criteria of "Major"). Going forward, I am going to start following the National Guidelines and delete religious sights and bodies of water unless there is a separate MI guidance/consensus to the contrary.
Boiler_81
 
Posts: 69
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 6:27 pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 20 times

Previous

Return to Michigan

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users