Shape Boundary Improvements

Request NEW features or CHANGES to existing features of the Waze Map Editor

If you think you've found a BUG, use the appropriate "Official Feedback" thread found in the Waze Map Editor forum (parent of this forum).

If you have a request for new or modified feature of the Waze Map Editor, use this forum.

Moderators: krankyd, Unholy

Forum rules
Request NEW features or CHANGES to existing features of the Waze Map Editor

If you think you've found a BUG, use the appropriate "Official Feedback" thread found in the Waze Map Editor forum (parent of this forum).

If you have a request for new or modified feature of the Waze Map Editor, use this forum.

Re: Shape Boundary Improvements

Postby Thortok2000 » Wed Oct 30, 2013 9:53 am

Well, for starters, every time it says (if attached) in regards to parking lots and such. If you had the add-a-shape, you wouldn't have to worry about it being attached, or crossing roads. You could draw the shape on one side of the road and then draw the shape on the other side and they'd be linked.

As for cutout, what about parks that include a lake? The cutout would work great with the water layer, to give it enough room to show up. (Unless water layer already overrides park landmarks, I don't know.)

It also says in the standards to not classify anything within a landmark as a different landmark (even if it would qualify for such) because it's already inside the larger landmark. Cutout applies to that too, cut out enough space that you can classify the landmark on the inside correctly.

Essentially, my point is that the current standards are based around the limitations of the current system. Were there to be additional abilities such as cutout and add-a-shape, I'm sure the standards would change to reflect that.
ImageImage
New job is taking up most of my time. =( Still occasionally poking around the Greenville, SC area.
Thortok2000
 
Posts: 361
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 1:01 am
Location: Greenville, SC
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 56 times

Re: Shape Boundary Improvements

Postby Thortok2000 » Wed Oct 30, 2013 11:55 am

Actually that wasn't what I meant but that sounds pretty handy too, basically landmarks that snap to the borders of other landmarks. But it does mean that the client wouldn't see a gap between them and it would be one solid block.
ImageImage
New job is taking up most of my time. =( Still occasionally poking around the Greenville, SC area.
Thortok2000
 
Posts: 361
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 1:01 am
Location: Greenville, SC
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 56 times

Previous

Return to WME Feature Requests

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users