Always ask a user to complete his UR going online

Request NEW features or CHANGES to existing features of the Waze Map Editor

If you think you've found a BUG, use the appropriate "Official Feedback" thread found in the Waze Map Editor forum (parent of this forum).

If you have a request for new or modified feature of the Waze Map Editor, use this forum.

Moderator: Unholy

Forum rules
Request NEW features or CHANGES to existing features of the Waze Map Editor

If you think you've found a BUG, use the appropriate "Official Feedback" thread found in the Waze Map Editor forum (parent of this forum).

If you have a request for new or modified feature of the Waze Map Editor, use this forum.

Re: Always ask a user to complete his UR going online

Postby bart99gt » Sat Feb 01, 2014 9:06 pm

Perhaps a better compromise would be simply to have a script that would automatically clean up URs with no user input and/or no conversations after 60-90 days.

I personally think that most URs that show up for no apparent reason are probably new users farming bonus points. Perhaps the best solution would to eliminate the bonus points or try to incorporate a method by which the UR has to be actually resolved before someone gets the points. It may cut down on the "missing overpass" URs on a road that doesn't have a bridge under/over another road for miles.
Image
Mississippi State Manager
Memphis, TN Area Manager

Mississippi Wiki Pagehttps://wiki.waze.com/wiki/Mississippi
bart99gt
State Manager
State Manager
 
Posts: 369
Joined: Mon Apr 15, 2013 9:53 pm
Location: Olive Branch, MS
Has thanked: 47 times
Been thanked: 108 times

Always ask a user to complete his UR going online

Postby Calopez78 » Wed Nov 27, 2013 1:44 am

Hi

The conversations feature is fantastic. I thought it was going to give me all information to solve every single UR published. But the fact is, when I don't get the problem and write the user in order to ask for more information (90% of times), only a few answer.

So I've found that my previous challenge of just closing a lot of UR as not identified has translated to
1. Send a message requesting for more information
2. Wait forever for a reply that won't come
3. Mark the UR as not identified

What if a user could only "complete" his UR when after automatically receiving a link for completing information (after having sent the UR in the app) he goes and fills that information. Only then the UR would be visible for editors in the WME.

I don't know if posting an UR gives points to a user. But under this idea, I think it should.

Best
Carlos A. López-Calopez78
Image
CM: Colombia
"Experto" en Colombia: Navegación/Ruteo
Moderador:Foro de Colombia.
Wiki: Waze en Colombia
Calopez78
Waze Global Champs
Waze Global Champs
 
Posts: 895
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 4:42 am
Has thanked: 356 times
Been thanked: 637 times

Re: complete UR going online

Postby Calopez78 » Thu Feb 20, 2014 7:16 pm

dbraughlr wrote:Put me down as opposed to requiring reporters to complete a UR submission online.
I am opposed to automatically purging older URs. The accumulation of URs in an untended area is a valuable signal to real problems and priorities.

Many URs contain enough information to complete with no interaction with the user..


Would like to know what you mean by "Many". I'm not lying when I say I believe 90% can't be solved and users won't reply to further information requests. For discussion purposes reduce that to 50% and it will mean that half of the time you spend opening, commenting and opening URs for improving the map is wasted time.

Regarding accumulation I admit is a valuable tool because the cluster of URs reveals something. But I'd change 100 UR's that may lead you to find the error for a single one well explained with the actual error.
Carlos A. López-Calopez78
Image
CM: Colombia
"Experto" en Colombia: Navegación/Ruteo
Moderador:Foro de Colombia.
Wiki: Waze en Colombia
Calopez78
Waze Global Champs
Waze Global Champs
 
Posts: 895
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 4:42 am
Has thanked: 356 times
Been thanked: 637 times

Re: complete UR going online

Postby ClayMaguire » Tue Dec 30, 2014 1:40 pm

dbraughlr wrote:It would be far better to have Waze improve the collection and presentation of data with the UR.

The actual GPS trace with little arrows, gps resolution distance ("accuracy"), the route being given, and to what roads Waze snapped should always be given.

The route being given should make clear all turn instructions including advance warnings and path reversals.

I would much rather see effort put into improving the data collection.


This is what I want to see. Two short green and purple lines don't tell me much. I want to see at least where the routes split and come back together.
ClayMaguire
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2014 2:05 pm
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: complete UR going online

Postby dbraughlr » Mon Feb 03, 2014 7:17 pm

Put me down as opposed to requiring reporters to complete a UR submission online.
I am opposed to automatically purging older URs. The accumulation of URs in an untended area is a valuable signal to real problems and priorities.

Many URs contain enough information to complete with no interaction with the user.

Furthermore, just because one editor can't figure it out from the information given doesn't mean that another editor cannot.


It would be far better to have Waze improve the collection and presentation of data with the UR.

The actual GPS trace with little arrows, gps resolution distance ("accuracy"), the route being given, and to what roads Waze snapped should always be given.

The route being given should make clear all turn instructions including advance warnings and path reversals.

I would much rather see effort put into improving the data collection.
Ѭ
dbraughlr
 
Posts: 566
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2013 2:24 am
Has thanked: 164 times
Been thanked: 98 times

Re: complete UR going online

Postby dbraughlr » Thu Feb 20, 2014 10:32 pm

Calopez78 wrote:
dbraughlr wrote:Many URs contain enough information to complete with no interaction with the user..

Would like to know what you mean by "Many".


I mean that I correct a lot of real problems solely from the initial report.
Suppose that it is only 10%. I do not wish to forfeit that 10%.
I think there are much better solutions to address your concerns without losing valuable reports.
dbraughlr
 
Posts: 566
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2013 2:24 am
Has thanked: 164 times
Been thanked: 98 times

Re: collecting better data

Postby dbraughlr » Fri Feb 06, 2015 3:54 pm

lordmage wrote:the reporter can select appropriate Subjects like "turn not allowed" or anything else and add as much as they can to the report like road names or intersection.


First of all, "turn not allowed" is a terrible subject.
It doesn't say whether the turn is allowed but Waze didn't use it or Waze tried to make a turn that isn't legal. It doesn't say what kind of turn. It doesn't say why the turn isn't allowed.
Fixing that subject would benefit everyone.

Where you have recurring reports, do you really have to close in only 9 days?
Could you send the reporter an email address where he can write to you?
When I've had multiple reports, I've usually found the problem by looking harder.
dbraughlr
 
Posts: 566
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2013 2:24 am
Has thanked: 164 times
Been thanked: 98 times

Re: Always ask a user to complete his UR going online

Postby dolphinwave » Sun Feb 15, 2015 4:09 am

Maybe we can compromise by having a pop up right before Waze ask if you want to shutdown. If there was/were reports, would you like to add more info to your "General map error?": Yes/No/Cancel request.
Image
dolphinwave
Map Raider
Map Raider
 
Posts: 44
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2014 3:05 am
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: Always ask a user to complete his UR going online

Postby lordmage » Fri Jan 02, 2015 10:17 am

this idea has merit. my suggestion on it is simple.
most of the times the reporter is tap driving which in most states you can not do anyway hands-free uses only.
when someone wants to report an error. App will save the point and the route driven until they are about to close app.
app then says you reported an error please give us more details on it.
the reporter can select appropriate Subjects like "turn not allowed" or anything else and add as much as they can to the report like road names or intersection. then submit. App uploads report with as much data as possible like. Route line for more then it is currently and some of the back route before the report, at least an equal measure. So we can see where the reporter came from for at least 2 miles before the report and were they went for more then 2 miles. another thing that would come in handy with the reports are the times in which they deviated from a route if they where navigating to a point.

Currently Due to how the system is setup. the reports are after the error at a stopped point or at some point along the error when they can type thur to submit it. if you Remove the need to drive type and make it easier for reports after the fact in the same session we may find more information given in the report.

in my area there have been quite a few general errors with no responses over and over for the same point. example UR received for a point. Editors ask for more info. there is no response at all it will close up to 9 days later or more then almost the next day at the same place the same type of UR and the Same place. ask for more info about it. no response. repeat. i think it might come in handy for the reporter's user name in the app to be listed rater then Reporter as well but that is a whole other issue
lordmage
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2014 7:05 pm
Location: baltimore,md
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: Always ask a user to complete his UR going online

Postby MGODLEW » Mon Dec 02, 2013 4:59 pm

I'm pretty sure this has already been suggested, but either way. I agree!
Image
Rank 6 US Champ, Waze Mentor & iOS Beta Tester | Waze Wishlist | Improper Edits | iPhone 6: JB iOS 8.1.2 |
Area Managing: State of Pennsylvania
MGODLEW
US Waze Champs
US Waze Champs
 
Posts: 1758
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 6:39 pm
Location: Pennsylvania
Has thanked: 632 times
Been thanked: 585 times

Next

Return to WME Feature Requests

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users