Page 4 of 9

Re: Should closing URs be limited to Rank 2+?

Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2014 7:10 pm
by HandofMadness
I'm at the point where most address edits in Map Maker are published immediately. Business locations still tend to get flagged for approval.

Re: Should closing URs be limited to Rank 2+?

Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 3:20 pm
by HavanaDay
Taco909 wrote:
Had a HUGE area of SoCal peppered in the last 24 hours with dozens of URs closed without comment by one user.
Sent a PM, he swore up and down that he commented but forgot to send it when he closed them.
He closed a number as "solved" on roads that were not editable to him.
He claims he was following the instructions of an L5 in removing reports more than 7 days old... yet I found one he closed in 4 days.
These types issues should be addressed with your SM (if there is one) and/or your RC.

Edited:

If you feel that you didn't get an adequate response from the original editor.

Re: Should closing URs be limited to Rank 2+?

Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 4:11 am
by HELGRAMITE
-

Re: Should closing URs be limited to Rank 2+?

Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2014 2:13 am
by HELGRAMITE
-

Re: Should closing URs be limited to Rank 2+?

Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 12:14 pm
by HELGRAMITE
-

Re: Should closing URs be limited to Rank 2+?

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 12:23 pm
by HELGRAMITE
-

Re: Should closing URs be limited to Rank 2+?

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 1:54 pm
by HELGRAMITE
-

Re: Should closing URs be limited to Rank 2+?

Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2014 8:54 pm
by HELGRAMITE
-

Re: Should closing URs be limited to Rank 2+?

Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2014 3:11 pm
by HELGRAMITE
-

Re: Should closing URs be limited to Rank 2+?

Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 6:55 am
by Kobes1878
Yessir. I proposed a similar idea here. (I was under the impression at the time that AMs have the ability to reopen closed URs.)

Also please see my Proposal for Waze and let me know your thoughts.