Bumping this one for a new question.
In light of the revised BC, is there any functional difference between these two junctions?
Every now and then I'll work a UR where someone did not get a "turn" instruction at the end of a block.
I always assumed it was BC squelching the instruction since there is only one way to go, but in some cases, such as a "square" block with a single entrance from the feeder, or worse when the roads zig-zag as is not uncommon in the hills, it can be confusing with no turn instructions once inside.
I recently considered that the lack of instruction MAY be the lack of a 46+ degree junction angle.
The app doesn't resolve to this detail anyways, so removal of the extra geonodes is of course a good thing... but will "cleaning up" these corners in neighborhoods result in a change in turn instructions without a "stub" to nowhere?
(I only used two geonodes to smooth the transition for simplicity, in actuality on the map, 4 and sometimes 6-8 are used to make it a smooth curve so the angle at the actual junction node is frequently nearly 180)
In light of the revised BC, is there any functional difference between these two junctions?
Every now and then I'll work a UR where someone did not get a "turn" instruction at the end of a block.
I always assumed it was BC squelching the instruction since there is only one way to go, but in some cases, such as a "square" block with a single entrance from the feeder, or worse when the roads zig-zag as is not uncommon in the hills, it can be confusing with no turn instructions once inside.
I recently considered that the lack of instruction MAY be the lack of a 46+ degree junction angle.
The app doesn't resolve to this detail anyways, so removal of the extra geonodes is of course a good thing... but will "cleaning up" these corners in neighborhoods result in a change in turn instructions without a "stub" to nowhere?
(I only used two geonodes to smooth the transition for simplicity, in actuality on the map, 4 and sometimes 6-8 are used to make it a smooth curve so the angle at the actual junction node is frequently nearly 180)
Re: [NEW] Best Continuation algorithm has been changed