The maps are maintained by a community of editors that have a vested interest in the standards outlined in the wiki. Your description of committee usefulness makes it obvious that you're frustrated and favor playing dictator, I don't think that will work here.sketch wrote:We built the Wiki ourselves, and it is ours to change. I understand the desire for a voting process, but I don't think it's necessary, and to be honest it seems like a bit of a nightmare. We can have a yes or no question asking whether members of the community approve, and if it's "no", we're left with the existing faulty system; or, we can have a few different proposals, none of which will ever get a majority.
Nothing truly great has ever come out of a focus group. Design by committee gave us the Chevy Citation, not the iPod.
If proposed changes to the standards outlined in the wiki are not met with obvious consensus in the forums, I then think voting on competing proposals is the best way forward (and leaving it the way it is shall always be an option).
Re: *UPDATED* Ramp naming convention proposal