Sun Apr 28, 2013 8:00 pm
Sun Apr 28, 2013 10:37 pm
Mon Apr 29, 2013 3:26 am
Nacron wrote:What will show if there's a map report on the unnamed segment? Police reported on unnamed road?
Mon Apr 29, 2013 8:16 am
Tue Apr 16, 2013 7:03 pm
vickimachado wrote:Think I'll test this theory on these ramp segments:
https://www.waze.com/editor/?lon=-157.9 ... 5,12925503
Attention was called to it with this UR:
https://www.waze.com/editor/?lon=-157.9 ... TTTFTTTTFT
In case it's closed, here's what it looks like:
The stated problem:
it told me to go the comlplete wrong way on the merger it split into 3 lanes and the map didnt even recogonize that
Just guessing that this was the "merger" that was meant, though it may not be. Drove there and when the highlighted segments then led either to the E-H3 or to the E-H201, I got no nav guidance telling me there was a choice.
Any idea on how to test this? Should I delete the name on both the highlighted segments, or just the first? (In any case, I'll save it someplace so I can put it back if it doesn't work!)
Tue Apr 16, 2013 11:23 pm
Mon Apr 22, 2013 4:01 am
vickimachado wrote:CBenson wrote:I didn't see the angle to cause the turn instruction. The turn seems to be back to no instruction.
Well, at max zoom, it shows, now less acute:
But it seems that won't work, right? (Haven't had a chance to recheck it.) Read the wiki, and it looks as if I should insert an unnamed ramp segment at the start of the split. I'll try that. Thanks again!
Sun Apr 28, 2013 1:25 am
https://www.waze.com/editor/?zoom=5&lat ... s=12947865
Just to circle back on my issue noted earlier. Adding a short unnamed FREEWAY road segment produced the navigational prompt I wanted at the split between the EH-3 freeway and the EH-201. Now as you approach the split, you're told to stay to the right to get on the EH-201. That warns drivers so they don't find themselves bearing left onto the H-3:
Previously I had tried an unnamed RAMP segment before the split and it didn't work. I'm sure that's explained somewhere in the Wiki, but I didn't get it.
Mon Apr 29, 2013 2:58 am
AlanOfTheBerg wrote:Vicki, the segment which should be unnamed is this one: https://www.waze.com/editor/?zoom=6&lat ... s=12925503. There's no reason for it to be named as it will never be shown on the navigation guidance. Then you can use two named ramp segments (one ramp segment named "to E H3 Fwy / Kaneohe" and the other named "to E H201 Fwy / Honolulu") at the split and both will be announced because the previous (long) segment was unnamed.
There's no need for all this extra kludgy stuff to be done.
Mon Apr 29, 2013 2:20 pm
sketch wrote:I cannot agree with the use of unnamed segments as a replacement for pathfinder segments in the United States, especially in light of kentsmith9's traffic concern.