ArtVictorP wrote:edsonajj wrote:ArtVictorP wrote:Before this feature, we didn't have to "keep an eye" on an UR, we just closed it as solved or unidentified at the moment. That's why it is said: "Ignorance is a bliss".
That depends more on your community than the comments feature, in México we already had a rule about not closing as "Not Identified" any reports for which the icon wow still yellow.
Good policy! May I know how good were its results?
It would be a good idea to apply it in Ecuador too.
foxitrot wrote:pizuz wrote:I guessed that this behavior was intended, but wouldn't it be possible to issue an explicit warning in that case? At least once?
I could not imagine one reason for such behavior to be intended. Except for simplifying the necessary code...
AlanOfTheBerg wrote:pizuz wrote:I think I found a serious bug... of some sort:
When batch-selecting a couple of segments that don't bear the same street name or city name (no common street and no common city), editing one of those fields deletes the contents of the other one.
This has been like this in the editor for two years. This is why, and the interface is quite clear, the No Name checkbox is selected for those fields which will be set that way if you continue.
There have been proposals to Waze to make multiple-selections more user friendly, but none have been enacted yet. Waze doesn't consider this a serious enough issue (it is not a bug) to spend time changing it at this time.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users