slandrum wrote:With the 11m segment allowing the U-turn, there may be some geometry issues. There may be no "straight" path out of the short segment, in which case any path out of it can be used for routing.
qwaletee wrote:3) Could we get an option to have "no name highlighting" only apply to specific road types? It is typical for parking lot roads, private roads, and often ramps and service roads to not have a name, and the highlighting only makes it busy. Usually, I want it for regular roads -- streets, primary streets, minor highways, major highways, and freeways. Sometimes ramps and service roads.
orbitc wrote:sketch wrote:I do think it'd be a good idea to exclude the "no name" highlight from parking lot roads, and perhaps also to include a highlight for named parking lot roads.
The ramp highlight is useful for determining whether some ramp segments are perhaps unnecessarily named. I could see it being desirable to be able to turn the no-name highlight off for ramp segments temporarily, but having it off for ramps and on for at-grade connectors (not something you can program around) seems like it'd be an inconsistent experience.
Cannot we achieve that using toolbox's sort option?
daknife wrote:Oh gee, yet another link to private information that most editors have no access to, even some level 6 editors.
Edited to remove private link.
Tapatalking via my Galaxy S4
Timbones wrote:doctorkb wrote:As of last night, the node highlighting (of soft turns, u-turn, revconns) is no longer working.
I feared that might happen. Given that Validator shows these too (?), I'm considering dropping this feature from my script...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users