FZ69617 wrote:

bz2012 wrote:After trying the latest development version, I found wild rapid 'scrolling' when attempting to click and drag to move the view.

I'm not aware of any changes in JAI that could cause such a strange behaviour.
I personally experienced "rapid scrolling" even without any addon enabled, thus maybe it just coincidentally happened to you after installing JAI.

Every time I've experienced this bug -- and it's happened a few times over the years -- it's been some interaction between Toolbox and URO.

EWK333 wrote:Hi, is there a way for this script to not automatically be active when WME loads?

Thanks

Just disable it in Tampermonkey or Chrome.

Arnoniem wrote: Did any of the devs pick this one up? Think it might need to be lifted over 169.00?

I don't know, I think 170 is already a little steep. If they decided to change the angle to 160-165 I would be fine with that, we just need to test.

Got it, sorry about that I thought you meant the Waze routing devs, rather than the JAI script devs. Carry on

Arnoniem wrote: >170 is not easy to create, but that makes it always a "thoughtfull" edit to create a u-turn instruction.

Perhaps, but maybe a little too thoughtful. The alternative is that you have a lot of 150-169 degree bowties that give a "Turn left", which is very confusing.

For reference:


Waze Selected, best continuation


None (TIO)


Continue (TIO)


To me, this is perfectly adequate.

I would recommend changing your "direction arrows" setting. To be honest I don't know why the first four options even exist. With a 'continue' they are misleading for sure. At least, there should be an 'up arrow' or carat ^ for continue with the first four options, if people like <> for exit/keep for some reason.

I say, just delete the first four sets. No reason to display the left and right arrow when the up-left and up-right would be more appropriate anyway.

ituajr wrote:In the process of testing, I also found that U-turn prevention did not trigger on this (straight) segment when the in/out segments were ordinary streets, but did trigger when I changed them to primary streets, thus confirming what Leorenaud said. All my in/out streets were two-way, again confirming what Leorenaud said.

For the record, as far as I know, this is a server-level configuration difference which is not true on the North American server.

White is the default color for both "none" and "continue" in JAI, which is something I wish would be changed. I personally recommend everyone change the color for "continue" to something else. I use light blue.

(Other things that should be enabled by default IMO:

• the direction arrows that show diagonal arrows for keep & exit should also be the default setting;
• check "override instruction"; and
• show angles of "override instruction".

Not having them enabled by default only causes confusion.)

JohnDoe75 wrote:Don't see how you can have a continue straight and something else than white in JAI

All of the colors can be modified in the JAI settings tab.

seb-d59 wrote:

sketch wrote:I would recommend changing your "direction arrows" setting. To be honest I don't know why the first four options even exist. With a 'continue' they are misleading for sure. At least, there should be an 'up arrow' or carat ^ for continue with the first four options, if people like <> for exit/keep for some reason.

For the moment, is the best solution

The problem:

Code: Select all

angleDisplayArrows: { elementType: "select", elementId: "_jaSelAngleDisplayArrows", defaultValue: "<>", options: ["<>", "⇦⇨", "⇐⇒", "←→", "⇐⇒⇖⇗⇑", "←→↖↗↑"]},	

Code: Select all

	var ja_arrow = {
		get: function(at) {
			var arrows = ja_getOption("angleDisplayArrows");
			return arrows[at % arrows.length];
		},
		left: function() { return this.get(0); },
		right: function() { return this.get(1); },
		left_up: function() { return this.get(2); },
		right_up: function() { return this.get(3); },
		up: function() { return this.get(4); }
	};

When I implemented the overrides, I simply added these two symbols: ⇑ ↑
And I had not tested the first 4 set of symbols

I think of a better way to do ...
Maybe just delete the first 4 set of symbols ?

Sorry, but I'm not the original author.

Choosing the last option works VERY well !