Thu May 07, 2015 8:38 pm
Fri May 08, 2015 10:21 pm
james890526 wrote:Thortok2000 wrote:SuperDave1426 wrote:Thanks for maintaining this highly useful WME addon. It's appreciated, and this is a highly useful tool used by many.
That said, this recent flurry of messages here is a prime example of why hardwiring an arbitrary "expire" date into such an important and widely used tool is a bad thing, regardless of what the "motivation" behind it is. If you happen to not be able to get around to doing an update (especially if it's for no other purpose than to update the "expire" date) by the deadline, then a lot of people get inconvenienced for no reason. It isn't broken - it just refuses to work because the date has passed.
It's a tool berestovskyy created. If it's a mean to help motivate him, why not? It's one of those perfect script that we've been using daily and taking for granted sometimes, so I'm satisfied if an update comes quick or slow or maybe never
What he said. We definitely appreciate the tool, but this isn't the smartest design decision.
Wed Nov 04, 2015 4:27 pm
Fri Nov 06, 2015 12:46 am
taco909 wrote:Rfrsw101 wrote:I'm just wondering, is there any way for Validator to be incorporated into a tab? Instead of having it up all the time. Such as [Validator] [Drives] [Area] [Settings]... But thanks for getting it working so quickly after WME changed.
Validator goes away when you use the URO+ option to eliminate the editor sidebar info.
Fri Nov 06, 2015 3:25 am
Fredo-p wrote:I'm not a fan of having Validator as a tab. I like having it "on". It's faster to clear the map by clicking the X vs to have to un-select a segment, click on a tab, hit the X, then go back to editing.
If anything, the only issue I have is Validator being on the top and only shown when user info is shown.
As a compromise, could we get the option of having Validator as a tab or not?
Sat Nov 14, 2015 9:19 pm
Tue Nov 17, 2015 7:19 pm
Wed Nov 18, 2015 9:05 pm
berestovskyy wrote:SuperDave1426 wrote:I would still prefer it to have its own tab.
Guys, I've played with tabs some time ago and I didn't like the tabs were wrapped onto a second line. I will give it another try, but it's not the highest priority ATM.
We could also try to put it into one of the existing tabs...
Thu Dec 17, 2015 5:11 pm
Fri Dec 18, 2015 1:29 am
t0cableguy wrote:Thanks for taking my post out of context.