Wed Jan 29, 2014 10:14 pm
Wed Jan 29, 2014 10:54 pm
Thu Jan 30, 2014 1:08 pm
pumrum wrote:"No connectivity from drivable road". It should say "No connectivity to a drivable road"
kentsmith9 wrote:In the mean time maybe it is better to have everyone split the parallel road as there is minimal down side even if that is actually not making any difference to routing.
dbraughlr wrote:I request additional options:
- Exclude any segment with name containing "CONST ZN".
- Flag any segments with name containing "CONST ZN".
olestas wrote:BUG After solving No inward connectivity (RED) problem, segment still remains highlighted in red until I select it again or refresh map.
olestas wrote:REQUEST And can segments located one over another or REALLY near be alerted as not connected?
Fri Jan 31, 2014 9:23 am
kentsmith9 wrote:olestas wrote:REQUEST And can segments located one over another or REALLY near be alerted as not connected?
Seems good if it can be done.
Fri Jan 31, 2014 9:38 pm
Sun Feb 02, 2014 8:21 am
Sun Feb 02, 2014 8:06 pm
Sun Feb 02, 2014 11:22 pm
Mon Feb 03, 2014 10:03 am
kentsmith9 wrote:I could have missed the discussion on this one, but how does this determine it is unnecessary?
Mon Feb 03, 2014 5:36 pm
Zirland wrote:I don't understand - how can I translate (localize) the Validator?
foxitrot wrote:It was possibly triggered by the detail, that both segments go from node B to node A
kentsmith9 wrote:Found a situation with a roundabout giving a warning "Same endpoints drivable segments."
Zirland wrote:how does the script determine when walking trail is used as railroad and when it is correct walking?