Page 86 of 237

Re: [Script] WME Validator 1.1.16 / 29.01.2016

PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 2:50 am
by Fredo-p
Don't know if this has been addressed, but Validator is flagging roads as a bad name with the Expressway abbreviation Expy.

Re: [Script] WME Validator 1.1.16 / 29.01.2016

PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 3:11 am
by Fredo-p
I'll go find it again and check. Strange, the text to speech was able to read Expy as Expressway.

Re: [Script] WME Validator 1.1.16 / 29.01.2016

PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 3:18 am
by Fredo-p
Expy is how they use it in ND.

Re: [Script] WME Validator 2020.04.12 (PLACES BETA)

PostPosted: Thu Jul 16, 2020 1:34 pm
by fuji2086
I have a suggestion for Validator. I think it would be useful to have an indicator on the Validator tab when Validator has too many issues. I sometimes pan around the map with Validator on and if I don't click a segment, I may not realize it's no longer highlighting segments because there are too many issues. Having a visual indicator without clicking on the segment would be useful for that use case.

Re: [Script] WME Validator 1.1.20 / 03.11.2016

PostPosted: Sun Nov 20, 2016 8:38 pm
by Fuze_
Validator has stopped working for both Chrome and Firefox for me. What's Wrong?

Re: [Script] WME Validator 0.5.7 (BETA) / 29.01.2014

PostPosted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 11:32 am
by fvwazing
Optimisation: you do not have to check the geometry if the boundingrectangles of segments do not overlap. But I guess you realized that one yourself. ;-)

Re: [Script] WME Validator 0.7.1 (BETA) / 20.02.2014

PostPosted: Sat Feb 22, 2014 1:15 pm
by fvwazing
Segments WITH HN (driveable or not) are different from segments WITHOUT HN in that they are a legit navigationtarget. Often walkingtrails are used to connect houses to the correct street, disconnecting these trails would send the wazers to the wrong side of the block...

You wouldn't need the complete list of HN, just the confirmation that a segment has HN. Is that a separate/faster query?

[Script] WME Validator 0.7.1 (BETA) / 20.02.2014

PostPosted: Sat Feb 22, 2014 9:17 pm
by fvwazing
berestovskyy wrote:
But still we have plenty of options for 'Non-drivable connected to drivable' check:
1. We can exclude dead-ends up to 300 m long.
2. Or we can enable check #115 just for some countries by request.
3. Or we can report just railroads connected to drivable roads.


I would go for #1; but the summum would be a recursive dead-end-check ;-)

Railroads are ALWAYS to be reported if connected to something drivable. As there are a number of countries that have substituted railroads by walking trail (with a distinctive name like "spoorlijn" or "railroad") those should be treated equivalent to RR.

Re: [Script] WME Validator 0.7.3 (BETA) / 24.02.2014

PostPosted: Thu Feb 27, 2014 11:15 pm
by fvwazing
berestovskyy wrote:
bgarch wrote:Enable "report railroads connected to drivable roads" for any country.

Force update the script, it's done few versions back:
24.02.2014 v0.7.2:
- UPD 'Non-drivable connected to drivable':
excluded short dead-end segments and segments with house numbers

19.02.2014 v0.7.0:
- NEW for ALL: 'Non-drivable connected to drivable'


Wow! So you DO check HN, though slow? Great!

Re: [Script] WME Validator 0.7.3 (BETA) / 24.02.2014

PostPosted: Fri Feb 28, 2014 12:06 am
by fvwazing
Some dev READS this thread, maybe? Hello! Welcome!