I've been pretty lucky over her in Wisconsin not to have any rogue editors tearing up the map. Of course I've had my share of them drawing way more than they should (love those parking lot parking spaces!) I come from the early generation of easily obtainable ranks and AM status just by asking nicely and having the edits to show. So I have seen people grind away just to jump from level 2 to level 4 in a matter of a week with no review. Those editors, although still around, don't seem to be as malicious as they once were. Seems that it was just a game for them. They achieved level and were done. That same mentality will exist forever. We'll always run into the edit grinder, but, there are many more checks and balances in place now to help prevent the problems they can cause.
We have more and more top quality, higher ranked editors (RC's, SM's, AM's and even good editors who don't want AM) that are watching their areas and seeing when someone starts to cause issues, and we stop it. Sure there might be some cleanup, but it is never unmanageable. Yes, there will be rogues, but really, how often does that kind of malicious behavior occur?
If we spend all our time focused on worrying about what might happen, we'll end up so paranoid that this won't be very inviting to the new and potentially great editors that we're trying to obtain.
I don't believe a lock level of 3 for mH and MH would be as devastating as some think it might be.
F=5
R=4
MH=3
mH=3
PS=2
S=1
I think that Railroads, Ferry and Runway's should be 4. Once in place there should be no reason to make edits to these without the scrutiny of a higher ranked editor. (Anyone notice there is now a 'stairway' type?)
That's my http://in-gender.com/cs/emoticons/TwoCents.gif on this.
(disclaimer: thoughts always subject to change as new information presented)
We have more and more top quality, higher ranked editors (RC's, SM's, AM's and even good editors who don't want AM) that are watching their areas and seeing when someone starts to cause issues, and we stop it. Sure there might be some cleanup, but it is never unmanageable. Yes, there will be rogues, but really, how often does that kind of malicious behavior occur?
If we spend all our time focused on worrying about what might happen, we'll end up so paranoid that this won't be very inviting to the new and potentially great editors that we're trying to obtain.
I don't believe a lock level of 3 for mH and MH would be as devastating as some think it might be.
F=5
R=4
MH=3
mH=3
PS=2
S=1
I think that Railroads, Ferry and Runway's should be 4. Once in place there should be no reason to make edits to these without the scrutiny of a higher ranked editor. (Anyone notice there is now a 'stairway' type?)
That's my http://in-gender.com/cs/emoticons/TwoCents.gif on this.
(disclaimer: thoughts always subject to change as new information presented)
Re: Great Lakes Road Lock Standards