Region Wide Place Locking Standard

Coordinator: GizmoGuy411 & ARC: RoadTechie | SkiDooGuy
------------------------------------------------------------

Moderators: delilush, roadtechie, GizmoGuy411, SkiDooGuy

Region Wide Place Locking Standard

Postby SkiDooGuy » Fri Jan 08, 2016 7:39 pm

Hello everyone!

So in an effort to start standardizing some things across the GLR a team has gotten together and started working on some items.


The one I am bringing to the table here is one that has been in place in Michigan for a while, and other people use it here and there.


I would like to set the standard of all "completed" places be locked at rank 3.


Completed

A place that has the name, address, phone number and website in it. All efforts should be made to gather hours and services as well. But as those can be extremely time consuming in some cases, they aren't as important. If an establishment doesn't have a website, then of course omit it.


Why R3?

Most of you have heard of IGN editors. For those that haven't they are a company Waze hires to come in and deal with the overload of place updates we see. For the most part we do a good enough job that they don't come around as often as they used to. That and Waze has told them to only touch major cities or ones past a certain age. IGN is notorious for rubber stamp approving everything. They don't worry about correct spelling, name, location, etc. Nor are they concerned about overwriting data on an already approved place.

For the most part IGN are R2. There are a couple R3 running around, but the majority are R2. So I have been locking place to R3 to much avail. The quality of places in the test areas that are monitored have much less place quality degradation. There are more PUR's that we see, but that gives us a better chance at filtering out the poor edits.


Any editors below R3 can still make edits and get credit for the edits once they are approved by a R3 or above. But for the most part, once a place is "completed" there usually isn't much updating to happen unless the establishment changes.

Almost everyone is active in a hangout locally where they can get uplock assistance if they aren't a R3, but they can also use the unlock/update forum for uplocks as well as unlocks.





Please provide any input you have on this as I am sure there is some angle I am missing.


Thanks!
Assistant Regional Coordinator: Great Lakes Region
Local Champ: Canada, USA
Country Manager: Canada, USA, Palau
Rank 6 editor
SkiDooGuy
Coordinators
Coordinators
 
Posts: 2156
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2013 6:01 am
Location: Michigan Based US/CA Country Manager
Has thanked: 669 times
Been thanked: 1481 times

Re: Region Wide Place Locking Standard

Postby vaindil » Fri Jan 08, 2016 7:50 pm

I normally disagree with Ski as a rule, but this is the exception. :P I've seen way too many terrible places last edited by IGN, this really works.
[ img ] [ img ] [ img ]
Michigan | Nexus 6P, Android 7.0
vaindil
Beta tester
Beta tester
 
Posts: 121
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2015 6:15 pm
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 84 times

Re: Region Wide Place Locking Standard

Postby JustinS83 » Fri Jan 08, 2016 7:51 pm

I am in full support of this.

This also helps protect against the new editors that quickly rank to R2 (or "trusted" R1's) and are then able to make changes to places without it triggering a PUR. This can happen with non-editors where they get the trusted status and are able to add terrible (inappropriate, blurry, irrelevant, etc.) pictures or create new places while driving, which can end up a mile+ from the actual location, which then presents problems with Place routing.
Script Writing Community Coordinator
[ img ][ img ][ img ][ img ][ img ]
JustinS83
Waze Global Champs
Waze Global Champs
 
Posts: 1324
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2014 4:33 am
Location: Franklin, OH
Has thanked: 337 times
Been thanked: 2345 times

Re: Region Wide Place Locking Standard

Postby zohar760 » Fri Jan 08, 2016 8:12 pm

100% on board with this. It's worked wonders in the Detroit area and across the state, and is a great way to filter incoming place information so you don't end up with lazy formatting and places getting moved into a road or parking lot by a user on the move.

Plus, I'm all in favor of disenfranchising IGN as much as possible. :D
[ img ][ img ][ img ][ img ]
SM: Michigan
AM: Detroit & SE MI (Wayne/Oakland/Macomb counties) | Marquette County MI

Saving the world - one UR at a time.
zohar760
Waze Mentor
Waze Mentor
 
Posts: 146
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2015 4:04 am
Location: Sterling Heights, MI, USA
Has thanked: 164 times
Been thanked: 97 times

Re: Region Wide Place Locking Standard

Postby Lonewolf147 » Fri Jan 08, 2016 10:39 pm

Sounds like a great idea. You have my support.
Lonewolf147
State Manager
State Manager
 
Posts: 372
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 6:01 pm
Location: Milwaukee, WI, USA
Has thanked: 209 times
Been thanked: 140 times

Re: Region Wide Place Locking Standard

Postby roadtechie » Sat Jan 09, 2016 12:31 am

Sounds like a great idea. I am in 100% agreement. However, since you brought it up I think we should also discuss what the locks should be on all places. Hospitals, universities, police stations, fire departments, ect. Should anything be locked above L3 and if so what should it be locked to.
-Roadtechie
[ img ][ img ][ img ][ img ]
Assistant Regional Coordinator | Great Lakes
Local Champ Mentor | USA
Country Manager | USA
roadtechie
Local Champ Mentor
Local Champ Mentor
 
Posts: 701
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2014 4:05 am
Location: Indiana, USA
Has thanked: 1463 times
Been thanked: 388 times

Re: Region Wide Place Locking Standard

Postby Lonewolf147 » Sat Jan 09, 2016 2:54 pm

roadtechie wrote:Sounds like a great idea. I am in 100% agreement. However, since you brought it up I think we should also discuss what the locks should be on all places. Hospitals, universities, police stations, fire departments, ect. Should anything be locked above L3 and if so what should it be locked to.


In Wisconsin, KB and I set our locking standards to the following:

Airport : 5
Hospital : 4
Fire Station : 4
Police Station : 4
Large areas - (State Parks, if mapped, etc.) : 4
Gas Station : 3
Most other places should be locked at 3, once completed.


Feel free to use that as a starting point for discussion :)
Lonewolf147
State Manager
State Manager
 
Posts: 372
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 6:01 pm
Location: Milwaukee, WI, USA
Has thanked: 209 times
Been thanked: 140 times

Re: Region Wide Place Locking Standard

Postby OhioStMusicMan » Mon Jan 11, 2016 7:40 pm

Let's do it. We can at least say L3 minimum and then flesh out other, higher locks as necessary.
Travis
Waze 4.48.0.2
iPhone 7 (VZW) - iOS 12.2 beta
Area Manager: Bakersfield, CA
State Manager: Ohio

[ img ][ img ][ img ][ img ][ img ][ img ]
OhioStMusicMan
State Manager
State Manager
 
Posts: 157
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:05 pm
Location: Toledo, OH
Has thanked: 60 times
Been thanked: 67 times


Return to US Great Lakes

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users