Clarity reviews for proposed "GLR Roles" wiki page requested

Coordinator: GizmoGuy411 & ARC: RoadTechie | SkiDooGuy
------------------------------------------------------------

Moderators: delilush, SkiDooGuy, GizmoGuy411, roadtechie

Re: Clarity reviews for proposed "GLR Roles" wiki page reque

Postby bauzer714 » Tue Sep 27, 2016 4:20 pm

Terry, I'd recommend that we expand the acronyms on the charts. An editor who may be unfamiliar with the abbreviations it is difficult to walk through the flowchart.
bauzer714
Area Manager
Area Manager
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2016 12:29 am
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 12 times

Re: Clarity reviews for proposed "GLR Roles" wiki page reque

Postby dchary2418 » Thu Oct 06, 2016 4:56 am

sorry this is late, my two cents, some of this was discussed at the meetup

1. R2 with 5000-10000 edits can be area managers

2. GLR/States can be subdivided into units where editors can become Area Manager
Editors should be limited to 3 areas or specified # of units based on editing rank, should fill out region/state before reassigning AM areas, but can be more than one manager per area

3. LAM’s limited to two editors per large area, if all LAM spots are filled, AM limit is waived

Dave
dchary2418
 
Posts: 375
Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 4:05 am
Has thanked: 271 times
Been thanked: 71 times

Re: Clarity reviews for proposed "GLR Roles" wiki page reque

Postby JoeRodriguez12 » Tue Sep 20, 2016 4:40 pm

markr4468 wrote:Thanks for doing this Terry. Much appreciated.

1) I would consider in the diagram, under "Editors", (R1-R6). This would just make it consistent with the other blocks and indicate that an Editor is of any Rank.

2) Under LAM: Add "notes" bullet so that that it is consistent with the other roles. Would possibly just be something about the expiration or other point.

3) Under Global Champ: Same as LAM, add notes bullet to be consistent.

4) ARC: Same as above, add notes bullet to be consistent

5) RC: Same as above, add notes bullet to be consistent

6) Question more than anything else, is R3 automatic based on points as a prerequisite to then getting AM or can an R2 be promoted earlier without having achieved the points for an R3 automatically?

Thanks!


Going along with #6, do you have to be an R3 or is there leeway on that promotion.

And to answer part of your question Mark, R3 is automatic but it is not unheard of to be promoted to R3 early. R4+ you need approval to rank up.

Thanks again Terry for the guide!
JoeRodriguez12
Coordinators
Coordinators
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 6:05 pm
Location: Chicago
Has thanked: 219 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Clarity reviews for proposed "GLR Roles" wiki page reque

Postby Kartografer » Mon Sep 19, 2016 6:08 pm

Thanks Terry. I would like clarification on the LAM role. Does it involve simply managing a large area, or is there more to it? The forum post got linked in your wiki doesn't really describe it, but the posts from last year in Ohio and Wisconsin do, although they both allow for change in the definition

Sent from my LG-H811 using Tapatalk
Kartografer
Wiki Master
Wiki Master
 
Posts: 1180
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2015 2:32 pm
Location: Westerville, Ohio, USA
Has thanked: 538 times
Been thanked: 773 times

Re: Clarity reviews for proposed "GLR Roles" wiki page reque

Postby ldriveskier » Mon Sep 19, 2016 6:12 pm

I would reword the second bullet under Notes. The first sentence is clear, but with the second sentence it leaves it unclear about what other roles can be held simultaneously. At a minimum, I would add "For example, " to the beginning of the second sentence.

The "Role Progression Diagram" has LC as R6, but the text below LC lists R5 as a prerequisite.

Also, is it true that an R5 can become CM, but you need to be R6 for RC/ARC? That seems backwards to me since there are multiple regions within the country.
ldriveskier
US Waze Champs
US Waze Champs
 
Posts: 817
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 9:05 pm
Location: Northeast Ohio, United States
Has thanked: 1455 times
Been thanked: 982 times

Re: Clarity reviews for proposed "GLR Roles" wiki page reque

Postby Lonewolf147 » Sun Oct 16, 2016 4:50 pm

TerryPurdue wrote:
Kartografer wrote:Thanks Terry. I would like clarification on the LAM role. Does it involve simply managing a large area, or is there more to it? The forum post got linked in your wiki doesn't really describe it, but the posts from last year in Ohio and Wisconsin do, although they both allow for change in the definition

Sent from my LG-H811 using Tapatalk

Fair point; we don't have a great writeup anywhere on the LAM role yet.

Lonewolf147, SM-WI, is working on a writeup. Once we it's ready, we'll post it for review as we did with this page.

Thanks!

-Terry


Hey all,
Sorry I've been off the grid for so long, and it's not likely that I'll be around much for the forseeable future (thanks to under staffing at work and my 12 hour days). I finally got around to writing up a rough draft of the LAM role. I invite everyone to check this out and provide your feedback. https://wiki.waze.com/wiki/User:Lonewolf147/LAM-WI
Lonewolf147
State Manager
State Manager
 
Posts: 372
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 6:01 pm
Location: Milwaukee, WI, USA
Has thanked: 210 times
Been thanked: 140 times

Re: Clarity reviews for proposed "GLR Roles" wiki page reque

Postby roadtechie » Mon Sep 19, 2016 11:47 pm

I would propose the wording to be changed on any role that requires a champ vote to be changed from "The editor must have a Champ nominate them for consideration for [ROLE] by the full group of US Champs." Replace with "The editor must have a Champ nominate them for consideration of [ROLE] to be voted on by the full group of US Champs."
roadtechie
Local Champ Mentor
Local Champ Mentor
 
Posts: 720
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2014 4:05 am
Location: Indiana, USA
Has thanked: 1579 times
Been thanked: 405 times

Clarity reviews for proposed "GLR Roles" wiki page requested

Postby TerryPurdue » Mon Sep 19, 2016 5:25 pm

There is now a draft GLR Roles wiki page up.

Before we that page is promoted into the official GLR wiki, we'd like to offer the Region's editors a chance to review for clarity (both the image and text).

Thanks!

-Terry
TerryPurdue
Local Champ Mentor
Local Champ Mentor
 
Posts: 964
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2014 2:05 am
Location: N. Virginia (DC Metro)
Has thanked: 555 times
Been thanked: 1064 times

Re: Clarity reviews for proposed "GLR Roles" wiki page reque

Postby TerryPurdue » Tue Sep 20, 2016 12:58 am

Kartografer wrote:Thanks Terry. I would like clarification on the LAM role. Does it involve simply managing a large area, or is there more to it? The forum post got linked in your wiki doesn't really describe it, but the posts from last year in Ohio and Wisconsin do, although they both allow for change in the definition

Sent from my LG-H811 using Tapatalk

Fair point; we don't have a great writeup anywhere on the LAM role yet.

Lonewolf147, SM-WI, is working on a writeup. Once we it's ready, we'll post it for review as we did with this page.

Thanks!

-Terry
TerryPurdue
Local Champ Mentor
Local Champ Mentor
 
Posts: 964
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2014 2:05 am
Location: N. Virginia (DC Metro)
Has thanked: 555 times
Been thanked: 1064 times

Re: Clarity reviews for proposed "GLR Roles" wiki page reque

Postby TerryPurdue » Tue Sep 20, 2016 1:48 am

ldriveskier wrote:I would reword the second bullet under Notes. The first sentence is clear, but with the second sentence it leaves it unclear about what other roles can be held simultaneously. At a minimum, I would add "For example, " to the beginning of the second sentence.

The Notes sections is updated to better show that it's an example case.

ldriveskier wrote:The "Role Progression Diagram" has LC as R6, but the text below LC lists R5 as a prerequisite.

The LC entry has been updated to show that R5 CM is a prerequisite to be considered, and that R6 is granted upon successful promotion to LC.

ldriveskier wrote:Also, is it true that an R5 can become CM, but you need to be R6 for RC/ARC? That seems backwards to me since there are multiple regions within the country.

  • The SM role has been updated to show that SM, ARC, and RC are the only three roles who manage editors
  • The CM role has been updated to specifically say that CMs only "manage" the map, they do not manage editors.
  • The Region Management section has been moved to the bottom section to show that the roles within are only available to Champs
Thanks!

-Terry
TerryPurdue
Local Champ Mentor
Local Champ Mentor
 
Posts: 964
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2014 2:05 am
Location: N. Virginia (DC Metro)
Has thanked: 555 times
Been thanked: 1064 times

Next

Return to US Great Lakes

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Fender_Bender42, Mythdraug