THANK YOU! for doing this everyone -- it is so great to see continuing standardization in Waze.
One quick nit-pick on the wiki page: You mention FAA identifier but then listed an ICAO identifier. I would recommend using the FAA identifier rather than the ICAO identifier for runway markings. I think if you try to standardize on ICAO (KXXX) you will just end up confusing the masses -- most people recognize the FAA identifier. Further, some airfields don't have an ICAO identifier but all airfields have an FAA identifier.
"SMF Runway 16R-34L" instead of "KSMF Runway 16R-34L"
I would also recommend at least mentioning taxiways -- either give guidelines on how to map taxiways, or state that taxiways should not be mapped; whichever the decision is.
One quick nit-pick on the wiki page: You mention FAA identifier but then listed an ICAO identifier. I would recommend using the FAA identifier rather than the ICAO identifier for runway markings. I think if you try to standardize on ICAO (KXXX) you will just end up confusing the masses -- most people recognize the FAA identifier. Further, some airfields don't have an ICAO identifier but all airfields have an FAA identifier.
"SMF Runway 16R-34L" instead of "KSMF Runway 16R-34L"
I would also recommend at least mentioning taxiways -- either give guidelines on how to map taxiways, or state that taxiways should not be mapped; whichever the decision is.
Re: Road Types (USA) – comprehensive overhaul of drivable ro